High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses CIDCO's Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Confirms Enhanced Compensation. Court upholds compensation enhancement under Land Acquisition Act, 1894, finding no grounds for interference....

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal filed by City & Industrial Development Corporation (CIDCO) against the judgment of a Single Judge in Writ Petition No.1211 of 2009, which had confirmed the aw...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Petition Challenging Environmental Clearance Requirement for Construction Project Near Coast. Building Plan Approval Prior to 2006 EIA Notification Does Not Exempt Project from Obtaining Prior Environmental Clearance Under the Environment Impact Assessment Notification, 2006....

The petitioner, M/s Saumya Buildcon Pvt. Ltd., a developer, acquired development rights over land in Worli, Mumbai, and submitted building plans for construction of rehabilitation flats, shops, a scho...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by NCB in NDPS Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Conspiracy. Control delivery and recovery of narcotics from parcels not sufficient to prove accused's involvement under Sections 29, 22, 23, 28, 8(c) of NDPS Act and Section 135(1)(a)(II) of Customs Act....

The case pertains to an appeal filed by the Intelligence Officer of the Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB) against the judgment of the Special Judge for Greater Bombay dated 02.04.1998-03.04.1998 in NDPS ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows CENVAT Credit for Input Services Used for Storage Tanks Outside Factory in Central Excise Case — Services Used in Relation to Storage of Inputs Eligible for Credit Even if Received Outside Factory Premises....

The appellant, M/s. Deepak Fertilizers and Petrochemicals Corporation Ltd., is a manufacturer of excisable goods under Chapters 28, 29, and 31 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. It installed ammo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Application by Beneficiaries of Trust Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Non-Signatory Beneficiaries Can Invoke Arbitration Clause in Trust Deed....

The applicants, beneficiaries of the first respondent trust (a private family trust created by a Deed of Trust dated 6th April 1983), filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conci...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Plaint in Property Suit, Holding That Amendment Seeking to Add Party and Correct Errors Does Not Change Cause of Action. The court set aside the trial court's dismissal of chamber summons under Order VI Rule 17 CPC, allowing the plaintiff to amend the plaint to add a necessary party and correct mistakes....

The petitioners, Smt. Pinky Devi and Mr. Neerajsingh Sunder Singh Thakur, filed two writ petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging orders dated 31-1-2012 passed by the Bomba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Injunction Against Electricity Company from Supplying Power to Other Consumers via Dedicated Distribution Facility. Petitioner's Exclusive Right Over DDF Infrastructure Not Established Under Electricity Act, 2003....

The petitioner, Mr. Budreddin A. Khan, a plastic processing factory owner, applied for an electricity connection under the Dedicated Distribution Facility (DDF) scheme of the Maharashtra State Electri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Market Committee's Petition Challenging Quashing of Market Fee Demand on Processed Chicken. Processing of Chicken Does Not Constitute 'Sale' of Agricultural Produce Under the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963....

The petitioners, Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Panvel, and its Chairman, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 29th November 2003 pa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Remand Order in Specific Performance Suit — Lower Appellate Court Directed to Decide Appeal on Merits. Remand Under Order XLI Rule 23 CPC Requires Satisfaction of Conditions; Appellate Court Cannot Remand Without Deciding Appeal on Merits....

The appellant, Subhash Moralwar, filed a suit for specific performance of contract against the respondents, Vilas Wankhede and others, in the trial court. The trial court dismissed the suit. The appel...