High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Process in PCPNDT Act Case Due to Invalid Complaint Filing. Complaint Filed by Unauthorized Officer Without Proper Authorization Under Section 28 of the Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, 1994....

The applicant, Dr. Sandhya Arun Kulkarni, challenged the order of issuance of process passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Chandrapur on 27-11-2012 under various provisions of the Pre-Concep...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Execution Decree in Property Dispute — Court Holds That Execution Proceedings Cannot Be Reopened After Final Decree and That Objections Under Order 21 Rule 97 CPC Must Be Raised Before Executing Court, Not by Way of Writ Petition....

The petitioners, who were legal representatives of the original judgment debtors, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the execution proceedings initiated b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Disqualification of Councillor Under Maharashtra Local Authority Members Disqualification Act, 1986. Failure to Comply with Whip Issued by Group Leader Constitutes Defection Under Section 3(1)(a) of the Act....

The petitioner, Avinash Mardikar, was elected as a councillor of the Amravati Municipal Corporation and appointed as group leader of a coalition (Aghadi) on 17 April 2012. On 6 June 2014, respondent N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Teacher's Petition for Retirement Age of 60 Years Under MP Act - Petitioner Entitled to Superannuation at 60 Years as Per Regulation 7 of Chapter 10 of Madhya Pradesh Secondary Education Act, 1951...

The petitioner, Vinayak Jankiram Ingle, was appointed as an Assistant Teacher on 05.08.1963/16.08.1963 by the Chief Executive Officer, Buldana, and worked in Government High School, Khamgaon until 28....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Petition by Managing Committee Members Challenging Penalty for Non-Compliance with Tribunal Order. Section 63 of Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994 empowers imposition of fine for failure to comply with directions of University or College Tribunal....

The writ petition was filed by members of the Managing Committee of Subhedar Ramji Ambedkar Education Society, Wardha, challenging an order dated 17-1-2005 passed under Section 63 of the Maharashtra U...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Gratuity Award — Delay in Filing Application Not Barred Under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. Limitation Under Section 7(7) Applies Only to Appeals, Not to Original Applications for Gratuity....

The petitioners, the Maharashtra State Cooperative Tribal Development Corporation Ltd. and its officers, challenged the order of the Controlling Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 direc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Cooperative Authority Order on Share Forfeiture. Court Upholds Order Based on Byelaw 7(8) and Opportunity of Hearing....

The petitioners, objectors, challenged an order dated 13 February 2015 passed by Respondent No.2 (the cooperative authority) which they claimed was without reason and failed to consider their specific...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Objections in Cooperative Election Without Specific Reasons. District Cooperative Election Officer's Order Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Natural Justice and Statutory Requirements Under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960....

The petitioner, Vishwas Chandar NejdarMane, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 13.3.2015 passed by Respondent No.2, the District Cooperative Election Officer, which rejected his objectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Tribunal's Deletion of Penalty in Sales Tax Case — Revenue Must Prove Gross Neglect. The onus lies on the revenue to establish gross or willful neglect under Explanation I to Section 36(2)(c) of Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, and the Tribunal correctly deleted the penalty relying on Indoswe Engineers (P) Ltd....

The case is a Sales Tax Reference under Section 61 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, arising from a dispute between the Commissioner of Sales Tax, Maharashtra State, Mumbai (applicant) and M/s. New S...