High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Builder's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance Order Under MOFA. The Court held that the Competent Authority has jurisdiction to grant deemed conveyance of land and building to the society, and disputes over balance FSI are civil matters....

The petitioners, a builder firm and its partners, challenged an order dated 5 May 2014 passed by the Competent Authority and District Deputy Registrar, Thane, under Section 11(3) of the Maharashtra Ow...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Execution Second Appeal as Not Maintainable Against Order Under Order 21 Rule 11 CPC. Order Allowing Execution Petition Under Order 21 Rule 11 CPC Does Not Amount to a Decree and Hence No Second Appeal Lies....

The case pertains to an Execution Second Appeal filed by B. Kashinath Choudhary against an order dated 11.03.2013 passed by the Principal Civil Judge (Jr. Dn.) and JMFC, Sagar, in Execution Case No.45...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Management's Petition Challenging Reinstatement Order in Service Dispute. Enquiry Vitiated Due to Non-Supply of Statement of Allegations with Chargesheet Under MEPS Rules, 1981....

The petitioners, Gramin Shikshan Prasarak Mandal and its Secretary, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the School Tribunal which allowed the appeal of the respondent no.1, Laxman Shyamrao ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Financial Institution in Suit for Recovery of Money Due to Failure to Prove Loan Agreement and Liability of Promoters. Equity Participation by Appellant Did Not Create a Debtor-Creditor Relationship with Respondents....

The appellant, EDC Limited, a financial institution, filed a suit for recovery of Rs. 17,50,000/- with interest against the respondents, M/s. GKB Ophthalmics Ltd. and its promoters/directors. The appe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Railway Lease Dispute. Arbitrator's finding of breach of contract and award of damages upheld as not perverse under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996....

The petitioner, Union of India, through the General Manager of Western Railway, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award dated 21s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal by Liquidator in Recovery Suit Against Bank for Wrongful Payment After Liquidation — Bank Liable to Pay Fixed Deposit Amount to Liquidator Despite Payment to Company Director After Winding Up....

The plaintiff, Gowribidanur Sahakara Sakkare Karkhane Ltd., a co-operative society under liquidation, filed a suit for recovery of money against Indian Bank and Siruguppa Sugar and Chemical Ltd. The p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Writ Appeals Against Revisional Order Under KVAT Act — Remand to Assessing Officer Required. Revisional Authority Under Section 63A Cannot Pass Fresh Assessment Order After Setting Aside Original Assessment; Must Remand to Assessing Officer....

The appellant, M/s Solidus Hi Tech Products Pvt Ltd, a company manufacturing press components, sheet metal enclosures, telecommunication equipments, bus bar, heavy electrical products, automotive comp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses State Appeals Against Single Judge's Directions on Vehicle Seizure under Motor Vehicles Act. Court Holds that Directions Were Reiteration of Rule 202-B and Custody Cannot Be Given to Parallel Operators Including State Transport Corporations....

The respondent, a tourist bus operator with 265 buses, filed writ petitions seeking a direction that his vehicles not be seized except by following the procedure under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Robbery Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 392 IPC set aside as sole testimony of victim was not corroborated by independent witnesses and identification parade was not conducted properly....

The case involves two criminal appeals filed by three accused persons (K. Ramanji @ Ramanjaneyudu, S.V. Ramanatha, and Amarendra) against their conviction under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code (I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Duty Limitation Case — Show Cause Notice Issued Beyond One-Year Period from Relevant Date is Time-Barred. The court held that the extended period of limitation under Section 11A(4) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 cannot be invoked without establishing suppression of facts or fraud by the assessee....

The Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs and Service Tax (Large Tax Payers Unit), Bengaluru, filed appeals under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, challenging the order dated 16.6.2014 p...