High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Condonation of One-Day Delay in Filing Income Tax Return Due to Technical Glitch. Delay of One Day in E-Filing Held to Be Beyond Assessee's Control, Entitling Condonation Under Section 119(2) of Income Tax Act, 1961....

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by M/s. Cosme Matias Menezes Pvt. Ltd. and M/s. CMM Logistics Pvt. Ltd. against the Commissioner of Income Tax, Goa. The petitioners sought a writ of cer...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Appeal in Part Regarding Computation of Deduction Under Section 80HHC of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Receipts from Hire of Barges, Proceeds of Services, Repairs of Vessels, and Extraction Charges Held Part of Total Turnover for Export Deduction....

The appellant, Sesa Goa Ltd., is a company engaged in the business of mining and export of iron ore. For the assessment year 1996-1997, the appellant claimed deduction under Section 80HHC of the Incom...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Ayurvedic Colleges to Conduct Common Entrance Test Through AMUPMDC in Challenge to Centralized Admission Orders. Unaided Private Ayurvedic Medical Colleges Held Entitled to Conduct Own Admission Process Under Article 19(1)(g) of Constitution and Indian Medicine Central Council Act, 1970....

The petitioner, Association of Management of Ayurvedic Medical Colleges Maharashtra, representing 44 private unaided Ayurvedic colleges, challenged orders passed by the Maharashtra University of Healt...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Delivers Judgment on Challenge to DCR 33(7) Surplus Area Surrender for Cessed Building Rehabilitation. Petitioners Contended Compulsory Acquisition Without Adequate Compensation....

The group of writ petitions before the Bombay High Court challenged the constitutional validity of clause 4 of Appendix III to Regulation 33(7) of the Development Control Regulations for Greater Mumba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Waiver of Statutory Cooling-Off Period in Mutual Consent Divorce Case Due to Irretrievable Breakdown of Marriage. Court Holds That Section 13-B(2) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Is Not Mandatory and Can Be Waived to Prevent Hardship When Parties Have Been Living Separately for Over Three Years....

The petitioners, a married couple, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad challenging an order dated 8 April 2015 passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Jalgaon, which r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Material Contradictions and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Sections 302 and 307 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt....

The case pertains to an incident on 28th August 2000 where the appellants allegedly assaulted deceased Dilip and injured Laxman with axe and sticks, leading to the death of Dilip. The trial court conv...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award in Commercial Supply Dispute — Upholds Award on Unpaid Invoices but Sets Aside Interest Rate. Arbitrator's findings on oral contracts and quantum of supplies upheld as not patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996....

The petitioner, Royal Palms (India) Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an arbitral award dated 8 June 2012 passed by a former ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Co-operative Bank Loan Dispute. Court upholds award holding borrowers jointly and severally liable for Rs.9.88 crore with interest under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996....

The petitioners, Abid & Company Steels Private Limited and its directors, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an arbitral award dated 21st April...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Arbitration Petitions Challenging Award on Family Settlement MOU — Upholds Arbitrator's Findings on Interpretation of MOU Clauses but Sets Aside Award on Certain Claims as Beyond Scope of Reference....

The judgment arises from two arbitration petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging a sole arbitrator's award dated 12 July 2011 (corrected on 24 August 2011...