High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA for Non-Application of Mind and Non-Supply of Vital Documents. Detenu's Retraction of Statement and Bail Conditions Ignored, Violating Article 22(5) of the Constitution....

The petitioner, son of the detenu Bittu Choith Harchandani, challenged a detention order dated 16.4.2015 passed by the second respondent under Section 3(1)(i) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Dying Declarations. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as dying declarations were not recorded in proper form and lacked corroboration....

The appellant, Rajkumar Shivnath Yadav, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Daman, for the murder of his wife Payal under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment. The prosecution case was ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Last Seen Theory Fails as Witnesses Contradict Each Other and Chain of Circumstances is Incomplete Under Sections 302 and 201 IPC....

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Kolhapur, dated 13th July 1993, in Sessions Case No.48 of 1991, acquitting the respondent Sadashiv Dhondiram Pa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision in Ejectment Suit for Lack of Title Proof and Non-Joinder of Necessary Parties. Trustees failed to establish devolution of leasehold interest and maintainability of suit under Section 41 of Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882....

The applicants, claiming to be trustees under a Deed of Wakf dated 22 December 1942, filed a suit for ejectment against the respondents in the Court of Small Causes at Mumbai. They alleged that the su...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator on Behalf of Respondent in Arbitration Application Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Respondent's Failure to Nominate Arbitrator Despite Invocation of Arbitration Clause Led to Court Appointing Arbitrator to Constitute Arbitral Tribunal....

The applicant, M/s. Bhagheeratha Engineering Ltd., filed an application under section 11(6) read with section 15(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of an arbitrator ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration Act Due to Failure of Appointed Arbitrator to Act. Court Appoints Retired Judge as Substitute Arbitrator Despite Respondent's Unilateral Appointment....

The applicant, Vanita Om Agrawal, filed an application under section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of an arbitrator. The parties had entered into a Memorandum...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Defamation Proceedings Against Journalist for Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC. Press Reporter's Official Duty Publication Requires Prior Sanction Before Prosecution for Defamation Under Sections 499/500 IPC....

The petitioner, Yogesh Balkrishna Kakade, a press reporter by occupation, was the accused in a defamation case (STC No.643 of 2008) pending before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Sakri, District ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Excise Penalty Case — Demand Notice Treated as Show Cause Notice for Violation of Natural Justice. The court upheld the Single Judge's order treating the demand notice as a show cause notice, finding no error in the direction to file objections....

The appellant, Rockline Bar & Restaurant, operated a bar and restaurant under a license granted under the Karnataka Excise Act and the Karnataka Excise (Sale of Indian and Foreign Liquor) Rules, 1968....