Bombay High Court Quashes Defamation Proceedings Against Journalist for Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC. Press Reporter's Official Duty Publication Requires Prior Sanction Before Prosecution for Defamation Under Sections 499/500 IPC.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 49
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Yogesh Balkrishna Kakade, a press reporter by occupation, was the accused in a defamation case (STC No.643 of 2008) pending before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Sakri, District Dhule, filed by the respondent No.2, Nimbajirao Zipru Deore. The petitioner filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court seeking quashing of the order issuing process and the entire criminal proceedings on the ground that the prosecution was barred for want of sanction under Section 197 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC). The petitioner contended that he was a public servant as a press reporter and the alleged defamatory article was published in discharge of his official duty. The respondent No.2 opposed the petition, arguing that the petitioner was not a public servant and that the publication was not in official duty. The court, after hearing the parties, held that the petitioner, being a press reporter, was a public servant and the act of publishing the news report was in discharge of his official duty. Consequently, the court quashed the order issuing process and the entire criminal proceedings for lack of sanction under Section 197 CrPC.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Sanction for Prosecution - Section 197 CrPC - Public Servant - The court considered whether a press reporter acting as a public servant requires sanction under Section 197 CrPC before prosecution for defamation. Held that the petitioner, being a press reporter and public servant, was entitled to protection under Section 197 CrPC as the alleged defamatory article was published in discharge of his official duty. The proceedings were quashed for lack of sanction. (Paras 1-10)

B) Defamation - Criminal Defamation - Sections 499/500 IPC - Journalist - The court examined whether a journalist can be prosecuted for defamation without prior sanction when the publication is in official capacity. Held that the complaint under Sections 499/500 IPC was not maintainable without sanction under Section 197 CrPC, as the act of publishing news report was part of the petitioner's official duty. (Paras 2-8)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the criminal defamation proceedings against the petitioner, a press reporter, could be quashed for want of sanction under Section 197 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, as the alleged defamatory publication was in discharge of his official duty.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the petition, quashing the order issuing process and the entire criminal proceedings in STC No.643 of 2008 pending before J.M.F.C., Sakri, District Dhule, for want of sanction under Section 197 CrPC.

Law Points

  • Sanction under Section 197 CrPC is mandatory for prosecution of a public servant for acts done in discharge of official duty
  • Defamation under Sections 499/500 IPC requires prior sanction if the accused is a public servant and the alleged act is in official capacity
  • Journalist acting as press reporter can be considered public servant under certain circumstances
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2015 LawText (BOM) (07) 50

Criminal Writ Petition No.980 of 2014

2015-07-03

S.S. Shinde, A.I.S. Cheema

Shrikant S. Patil for Petitioner, S.D. Kaldate (APP) for Respondent No.1, C.R. Deshpande for Respondent No.2

Yogesh Balkrishna Kakade

State of Maharashtra and Nimbajirao Zipru Deore

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal Writ Petition seeking quashing of defamation proceedings for want of sanction under Section 197 CrPC

Remedy Sought

Quashing of order issuing process and entire criminal proceedings in STC No.643 of 2008

Filing Reason

Petitioner, a press reporter, was prosecuted for defamation without prior sanction under Section 197 CrPC, as the alleged defamatory article was published in discharge of official duty

Previous Decisions

Order issuing process was passed by J.M.F.C., Sakri, District Dhule in STC No.643 of 2008

Issues

Whether the petitioner, a press reporter, is a public servant entitled to protection under Section 197 CrPC? Whether the alleged defamatory publication was in discharge of official duty, requiring prior sanction for prosecution?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that he is a public servant as a press reporter and the article was published in discharge of official duty, thus sanction under Section 197 CrPC is mandatory. Respondent No.2 argued that the petitioner is not a public servant and the publication was not in official duty, so no sanction is required.

Ratio Decidendi

A press reporter, being a public servant, cannot be prosecuted for defamation under Sections 499/500 IPC for an act done in discharge of official duty without prior sanction under Section 197 CrPC.

Judgment Excerpts

The Petitioner is accused in S.T.C. No.643 of 2008 pending before J.M.F.C., Sakri, DistDhule, in defamation case filed by Respondent No.2. The present Writ Petition has been filed seeking quashing of order issuing process and the entire criminal proceedings for want of sanction under Section 197 CrPC.

Procedural History

The petitioner was accused in STC No.643 of 2008 filed by respondent No.2 for defamation. The Magistrate issued process. The petitioner then filed Criminal Writ Petition No.980 of 2014 before the Bombay High Court seeking quashing of the proceedings for lack of sanction under Section 197 CrPC.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 197
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 499, 500
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Husband for Murder of Wife — Insanity Defense Rejected. The court held that the accused failed to prove legal insanity under Section 84 IPC, as the evidence did not establish incapacity to know the nature of ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Defamation Proceedings Against Journalist for Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC. Press Reporter's Official Duty Publication Requires Prior Sanction Before Prosecution for Defamation Under Sections 499/500 IPC.