High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petitions by Cab Company Against Drivers, Appoints Sole Arbitrator. Arbitration clause in Driver Agreement survives termination under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996....

The petitioner, Meru Cab Company Private Limited, filed four arbitration petitions under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of an arbitrator to resolve dispu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision of Amenity Space Computation by Adjusting DP Road Area in Development Proposal. The court held that the area reserved for Development Plan roads, being a public amenity, can be adjusted towards the amenity space required under the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 and Development Control Regulations....

The petitioners, Runwal Homes Pvt. Ltd. and Mr. Subodh Runwal, owned a plot of land in Nahur, Bhandup (West), Mumbai, which was affected by Development Plan (DP) road reservations for a 45.70 m wide M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Challenge to University’s Denial of Permanent Approval to Contractually Appointed Lecturers. Petitioners Alleged Violation of UGC Exemption Norms After Acquiring M.Phil During Continuous Service....

The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by three lecturers—Ram Phawade, Shivaji Shinde, and Shrimant Bhalke—against the State of Maharashtra, the Joint Director ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Director of Physical Education Against University's Refusal to Approve Appointment. University Cannot Impose Ph.D. Requirement Beyond UGC Regulations for Appointment of Director of Physical Education....

The petitioner, Vijay Digambar Hande, was appointed as Director of Physical Education by respondent nos. 4 and 5 (the college management) on 01.07.2009. He possessed qualifications of M.A., M.P.Ed. in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Recruitment Reservation Policy for Project Affected Persons Under Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act, 1999. Court Holds that Section 10(6)(a) Prescribes 5% Quota for PAPs, and Section 6(c) Ensures Priority Within That Quota, Not an Overall 50% Reservation....

The dispute arose from the acquisition of lands of the petitioners for the establishment of the Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Agricultural University at Parbhani. The petitioners, being project affected p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Co-owner Property Dispute — Holds That Possession of Co-owner Is Not Adverse Without Ouster. The court ruled that the burden of proving ouster lies on the party claiming adverse possession, and the suit for declaration and possession was within limitation under Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963....

The case involves a property dispute among co-owners. The appellants (original plaintiffs) filed a suit for declaration of title and possession of agricultural land, claiming that they and the respond...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to University's Refusal for Permanent Approval of Lecturers. Legal Question Involves NET/SET Exemption for M.Phil Holders Under UGC Regulations....

The Writ Petition No. 5336 of 2012 was filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, by three lecturers—Ram Raosaheb Phawade (History), Shivaji Pundlikrao Shinde (Marathi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Director of Physical Education Against University's Refusal to Approve Appointment - University Cannot Impose Ph.D. Requirement Beyond UGC Regulations for M.P.Ed. Qualified Candidate....

The petitioner, Vijay Digambar Hande, was appointed as Director of Physical Education by respondent no.4 Sharadopasak Shikshan Sanstha at Master Dinanath Mangeshkar Senior College. The petitioner poss...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Challenge to 5% Quota for Project Affected Persons in Agricultural University Recruitment. Court Upholds Government's Interpretation of Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act, 1999, Limiting Reservation to 5% Priority Quota Under Section 10(6)(a), Not 50% Under Section 6(c)....

The matter involved two writ petitions filed by project affected persons whose lands were acquired for the establishment of Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Agricultural University, Parbhani. The core disput...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Injunction Dismissed as Plaintiff Failed to Prove Title and Possession....

The case involves a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, arising from a suit for declaration of ownership and injunction filed by the original plaintiff (since decease...