High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Petition by Union of India for Mandatory Army NOC near Colaba Military Station — Security Concerns Over Adarsh Building Construction. The petition sought demolition of the Adarsh Cooperative Housing Society building for lack of security clearance from the Defence Department as required for constructions near military installations....

This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution was filed by the Union of India through the Indian Army seeking a mandamus to restrain the State of Maharashtra, the Municipal Corporation of G...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Condonation of Delay in Filing Section 34 Petition as Limitation Period Under Section 34(3) of Arbitration Act is Not Extendable Beyond 30 Days. Delay of 31 days beyond the prescribed period of three months cannot be condoned as the proviso allows only a further 30 days and no more....

The applicant, Jolly Brothers Pvt. Ltd., filed a Notice of Motion seeking condonation of delay of 31 days in filing a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to challen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Matrimonial Dispute Due to Settlement Between Parties — Inherent Powers Under Section 482 CrPC Used to Prevent Abuse of Process. Settlement Between Husband and Wife Leads to Quashing of FIR for Offences Under Sections 323, 326, 342, 506 IPC....

The applicants, including the wife (applicant No.1) and her brothers (applicant Nos.2 and 3), filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Acquittal in Cheque Bounce Case — Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Not Rebutted by Accused. The court restored conviction under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for dishonour of two cheques of Rs.1 lakh each....

The appellant, M/s Radhesham Laxminarayan and Co., a partnership firm, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against the respondent, Kashmirilal s/o Harising Gupt...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petitions in KVAT Act Case — Remands Matter to Tribunal for Fresh Consideration on Input Tax Credit Disallowance. The court held that the Tribunal must decide appeals on merits and cannot dismiss them without examining the grounds raised by the assessee....

The petitioner, M/s. Manasa Electricals Co., is a trader in electrical goods. For the assessment year 2005-06, the petitioner filed KVAT returns in Form No.100, later revised returns, and annual retur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC020009812016_1...

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Reinstatement of Bank Clerk in Misappropriation Case Due to Flawed Enquiry. Industrial Court's Reversal Set Aside as Labour Court's Finding of Enquiry Unfair Was Based on Proper Appreciation of Evidence....

The petitioner, Nanasaheb Eknath Suryawanshi, was employed as a clerk with the Pune District Central Coop. Bank Ltd. since 1982. On 06/11/1995, he was chargesheeted for misappropriation of funds by al...