High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order Under Maharashtra Police Act for Lack of Continuous Activity. Single FIR for Offence Under SC/ST Act Does Not Constitute 'Offences' Required Under Section 56(1)(bb) Read with Section 2(a)(iv) of Maharashtra Prevention of Communal, Anti-Social and Other Dangerous Activities Act, 1980....

The petitioner, Aamna Bi Shiekh Pir Mohd Sheikh, challenged an externment order passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Police, Nagpur, under Section 56(1)(bb) of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951. The no...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Petition Challenging Deferred Cross-Examination Order in Murder Trial. Sessions Court's Discretionary Order Under Section 231(2) CrPC Allowing Examination-in-Chief of All Eye Witnesses Before Cross-Examination Upheld as Not Illegal or Perverse....

The State of Maharashtra filed a criminal writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging an order dated 17.01.2018 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Jalgaon, in Sessions Case N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Removal of Peon for Habitual Absence in Disciplinary Proceeding. Service Rule Violation Justifies Dismissal as Petitioner Failed to Show Sufficient Cause for Absence....

The petitioner, Vikas Sureshrao Waghmare, was appointed as a Peon in the District Court, Ahmednagar on 11.10.2001 and made permanent from 18.04.2006. He worked honestly for several years. In 2015, his...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Informant's Petition to Restrict Cross-Examination of Prosecution Witness to Suicide Note in Dowry Death Case. Recall of witness under Section 311 CrPC is limited to the purpose for which recall was granted, and cross-examination cannot be expanded beyond the scope of the new evidence....

The petitioner, Kartar s/o Tahelram Makhija, was the original informant in a criminal case registered against respondents No. 1 to 3 (accused) for offences under Sections 304B, 306, 498A read with Sec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order Under Maharashtra Police Act for Lack of Continuous Activity. Single FIR for Offences Under Indian Penal Code Not Sufficient to Invoke Section 56(1)(bb) of Maharashtra Police Act, 1951....

The petitioner, Aamna Bi Shiekh Pir Mohd Sheikh, challenged an externment order passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Police, Zone 3, Nagpur, under Section 56(1)(bb) of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Dismisses State's Petition Challenging Deferred Cross-Examination Order in Murder Trial. Trial Court's Discretion Under Section 231(2) CrPC to Prevent Witness Improvement Upheld....

The State of Maharashtra filed a criminal writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 17.01.2018 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Jalgaon in Session...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Removal of Peon for Habitual Absence in Disciplinary Proceedings. Administrative Appeal Dismissed as Petitioner Failed to Show Sufficient Cause for Absence and Disobeyed Transfer Orders....

The petitioner, Vikas Sureshrao Waghmare, was appointed as a Peon in the District Court, Ahmednagar on 11.10.2001 and was made permanent from 18.04.2006. He worked at different stations without any bl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Informant's Petition to Restrict Cross-Examination of Prosecution Witness to Suicide Note in Dowry Death Case. Court holds that recall of witness under Section 311 CrPC is limited to the purpose for which recall was granted, and cross-examination cannot be expanded beyond the scope of the new evidence....

The petitioner, Kartar Makhija, was the original informant in a case involving offences under Sections 304B, 306, 498A read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code against respondents No. 1 to 3 (acc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Land Tribunal Order Granting Tenancy Rights in Land Reforms Case — Tribunal Failed to Consider Evidence and Conduct Proper Inquiry Under Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961....

The petitioner, K.T. Venkatappa (since deceased, represented by his legal representatives), filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 13...