High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes AICTE Closure Order for Retrospective Application of Norms and Violation of Natural Justice. AICTE's Approval Process Handbook Norms Cannot Be Applied Retrospectively to College Established in 1992....

The case involves a college established by a Trust in 1992 with initial approval from AICTE. The college expanded and shifted its campus over time. After the founder's death, a family dispute arose, a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions by Unaided Schools Challenging Denial of Grant-in-Aid. Reservation Policy Condition in Government Resolution Upheld as Reasonable; Schools Must Comply with Statutory Mandates Under Maharashtra Act No. VIII of 2003 and Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 Before Receiving Aid....

The case involved multiple writ petitions by unaided private secondary schools in Maharashtra challenging conditions imposed by the State Government for receiving grant-in-aid. The petitioners had est...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Transfer of Assistant Professors from Autonomous College. Government retains administrative control over employees recruited before grant of autonomy, and transfer order is not ultra vires....

The petitioners, Assistant Professors, were recruited by the State Government before their college became autonomous. Subsequently, the government transferred them to other colleges. The petitioners c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Court's Order on Unfair Labour Practices by Mumbai University; Directs Payment of Salary Equivalent to Lowest Grade. Employment of Workers on Casual Basis for Extended Periods Without Permanency Amounts to Unfair Labour Practice Under Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971....

The judgment pertains to a batch of 18 writ petitions arising from complaints before the Industrial Court under the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Ac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Allows Writ Petition Challenging DRT Order on Condonation of Delay in Review Application — Limitation for Review Under Section 17 of Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993 Governed by Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963....

The Petitioner, MSTC Limited, a Government of India Enterprise, filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 21st April 2018 passed by the Debts Reco...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Maharashtra Poison Rules 1972 Conditions on Methanol Dealing — Extra-Territoriality Challenge Rejected. Rule 18(2) conditions are intra-territorial and valid under Article 245 of the Constitution of India as they regulate activities within Maharashtra's jurisdiction....

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by manufacturers and traders of methanol challenging the validity of conditions imposed under Rule 18(2) of the Maharashtra Poison Rules 1972. The petiti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates on Validity of HPCL Notifications Discontinuing and Revising Pension Benefits. The Court Examines Whether Employees Recruited Post-Acquisition and Retired Under ESSO/LIL Plans Are Entitled to Pension Protections Under ESSO Act, 1974 and Amalgamation Order....

The case involved a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the Pensioners Social & Welfare Association, a registered society representing retired workmen of Hindustan Pe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 73 OF 2015...

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Sale Deed Not a Sham Transaction. Appellant failed to prove that sale deed dated 3.2.1975 was without consideration or a sham document; concurrent findings of courts below upheld....

The case involves a property dispute between two brothers, Shashikant Haribhau Bandewar (appellant-plaintiff) and Bhalchandra Haribhau Bandewar (respondent-defendant). The appellant filed a suit seeki...