High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Abetment of Suicide Case. Allegations of Dowry Demand and Cruelty Not Sufficient to Prove Abetment Under Section 306 IPC or Cruelty Under Section 498-A IPC Against Relatives Living Separately....

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of four accused persons by the 3rd Ad-hoc Assistant Sessions Judge, Nashik, in a case involving the suicide of Anita, who was married to accused...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Concurrent Orders Under Maharashtra Tenancy Act — Petitioner Failed to Prove Tenant Status. Landlord's Application for Possession Under Section 32-O Allowed as Tenant Could Not Establish Cultivation After Tillers' Day....

The petitioner, Shri Ananda Sakharam Padalkar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the judgment and order dated 12th March 2018 passed by the Maharashtra R...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Summary Suit for Recovery of Loan Due to Unenforceable Oral Agreement and Lack of Written Contract. Loan advanced for litigation funding held to be a contingent agreement not enforceable under Order 37 CPC as it lacked a written contract and was based on an oral understanding....

The plaintiff, Vishal Kedia, filed a commercial summary suit under Order 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the defendant, Sureshkumar S. Bafna, for recovery of Rs.2,11,51,500/- with int...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Development Plan Reservation — Lapse of Reservation Under Section 127 of MRTP Act. Landowners Entitled to Develop Lands as Acquisition Not Completed Within Ten Years....

The petitioners, owners of lands bearing Survey Nos. 103 and 104 at Kopargaon, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the second revised development plan of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376 IPC and Section 4 of POCSO Act, 2012 set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt....

The appellant, G S Venkatesh, was convicted by the I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Chikkaballapur, in Special S.C. No.12/2016 for offences punishable under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Dowry Harassment Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence. Allegations of Cruelty Under Section 498-A IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act Found Manifestly False Based on Correspondence and Prior Legal Proceedings....

The applicants, including the husband, his parents, and a relative, sought quashing of FIR No.272/2019 registered at Ambazari Police Station, Nagpur, for offences under Section 498-A read with Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Petition Seeking Disqualification of Panch for Alleged Pecuniary Interest in Resolution. Section 12(1)(d) of Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 requires pecuniary interest to be direct and personal, not merely as a family member of beneficiary....

The petitioner, a registered voter from Ward No.II of Arambol Village, filed a writ petition seeking a declaration that Respondent No.4, a Panch of the Village Panchayat of Arambol, stood disqualified...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Partition Suit — Finds Trial Court Erred in Holding Suit Not Maintainable Due to Prior Family Arrangement. The Court held that a family arrangement need not be in writing and can be inferred from conduct, but the trial court failed to consider evidence and misapplied Order 23 Rule 3 CPC....

The appellants (original defendants) filed a First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment and decree dated 25th February 2020 passed by the Civil Judge ...