High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Petitioners' Writ Petition in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Non-Compliance with Lok Adalat Settlement Alleged. Court Examines Whether Mandamus Should Issue to Enforce Settlement and Dispose Pending Section 28-A Applications Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894....

The dispute concerned land acquisition for the New Bombay Project. Petitioners, agriculturists from village Roadpali, Taluka Panvel, District Raigad, owned lands that were notified for acquisition in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Show Cause Notices in Service Tax Case Due to Inordinate Delay in Adjudication. Petitioner's right to speedy adjudication violated as show cause notices from 2011-2015 remained undecided for over 5 years without any fault of the petitioner....

The petitioner, Reliance Transport and Travel Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking quashing of four show cause notices issued by the respondent, the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Show Cause Notices in Service Tax Case Due to Limitation and Lack of Jurisdiction. Multiple SCNs issued beyond normal period of limitation without proper justification under proviso to Section 73(1) of Finance Act, 1994 are invalid....

The petitioner, ATA Freight Line (I) Pvt. Ltd., a company engaged in freight forwarding and logistics services, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay H...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging GST Assessment Orders on Grounds of Violation of Natural Justice and Lack of Proper Adjudication. The court set aside the impugned orders and remanded the matters for fresh adjudication after affording proper opportunity of hearing....

The petitioner, CNH Industrial (India) Private Limited, filed two writ petitions challenging assessment orders passed under the GST Act. The petitioner contended that the impugned orders were passed w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder and Atrocity Case — Acquittal Upheld Due to Inconsistent Evidence. Prosecution Failed to Prove Unlawful Assembly and Caste-Based Motive Under Sections 143, 147, 148, 302, 109 read with 149 IPC and Section 3(2)(v) of SC/ST Act....

The State of Karnataka appealed against the judgment dated 30.09.2014 passed by the Special Judge and II Additional Sessions Judge, Bijapur in Spl.C.No.90/2008, whereby the respondents/accused were ac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in POCSO Case — Prosecution Fails to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Inconsistencies in Victim's Testimony and Lack of Corroboration Lead to Confirmation of Acquittal Under Sections 376(1), 342, 506 IPC and Sections 4, 8, 12 of POCSO Act, 2012....

The State of Karnataka filed an appeal under Section 378(1) & (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the judgment of acquittal dated 03.02.2017 passed by the III Additional District ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Tenant Defendants in Possession Suit, Sets Aside Injunction. Court holds that tenants in possession cannot be injuncted without a decree for possession, and a suit for injunction simpliciter is maintainable against a landlord....

The case involves two appeals arising from a common order of the Learned Single Judge dated 6th September 2021. The Appellant in Appeal No.551 of 2019 is the Original Defendant No.1 (Sanjay Mishrimal ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Lapse of Reservation Under Section 127 of MRTP Act for Land Reserved for Garden Since 1976 — Award Under Section 23 of RFCTLARR Act 2013 Quashed as Acquisition Not Completed Within Statutory Period...

The petitioners, owners of land in Kankavali, challenged the reservation of their land for a garden under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 (MRTP Act) since 1976. They sought a decl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rule M-3 of DCPR for Satara Region as Ultra Vires. Rule requiring 12m wide access road for plot subdivision is a valid development control regulation under MRTP Act, 1966 and does not amount to uncompensated acquisition....

The petitioners, Suhas Shridhar Shahane and Subhash Kondiram Sawant, landowners in Satara, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challenging...