High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Tribunal Orders in SARFAESI Proceeding. Borrowers Failed to Comply with Conditional Orders and Sale Certificate Was Already Issued to Auction Purchaser....

The case arose from a writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging two orders of the Debts Recovery Tribunal-II, Bengaluru dated 8 March 2023 and 15 March 20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010064292023_1...

The writ petition was filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the report of the District Caste Verification Committee (DCVC) dated 27-10-2021 and seeking confirmation...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Temple Committee Term Commencing from Date of Order in Religious Endowment Dispute. Term of Management Committee of Sri Mukambika Temple, Kolluru, to begin from date of Commissioner's order, not from date of assuming charge, under Section 28 of Karnataka Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments Act, 1997....

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging an order dated 27.10.2020 passed by the Commissioner of the Hindu Religious and Char...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Challenging Denial of Clinic Registration Under Karnataka Private Medical Establishments Act, 2007 — CMS-ED Qualification Not Recognized as Medical Qualification Under the Act....

The petitioner, Dr. Annaiah N., a medical practitioner running Sangeetha Clinic, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an endorsement dated 25-09-20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging KSAT Order in Service Matter — Transfer of Assistant Director Upheld as Administrative Decision. Court holds that transfer orders are not subject to judicial review unless mala fides or violation of statutory rules are established, and that the Tribunal's refusal to grant interim relief was justified....

The petitioner, Sri K.M. Prashanth Kumar, was initially working as an Assistant Town Planner and was promoted to the post of Town Planner at Mysore Urban Development Authority (MUDA) vide order dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Visa Extension Rejection for Yemeni National Due to Non-Application of Mind and Violation of Natural Justice. The court directed reconsideration of visa extension application considering force majeure and medical reasons....

The petitioner, a Yemeni national, came to India in 2013 on a student visa valid until 06-08-2014. He could not complete his studies due to language barriers and health issues, and returned to Yemen o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Second Wife’s Challenge to 50% Family Pension Order; Upholds Equal Shares for Both Widows Under Rule 75(7)(i)(a) of Railway Services (Pension) Rules, 1993. Second Wife’s Claim Recognized Despite Void Marriage Under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Based on Service Rule Mandating Equal Distribution Among Multiple Widows....

The dispute pertained to the entitlement of family pension following the death of a railway employee who had married twice. The employee, R. Ramesh Babu, died in harness on 04-05-2021 while working as...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Detention Under COFEPOSA — Detenu Failed to Show Non-Application of Mind by Detaining Authority. The Court upheld the preventive detention order under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA, finding that the detaining authority had applied its mind to all relevant materials and the grounds of detention were not vague....

The case involves a writ petition filed by the detenu challenging a preventive detention order passed by the Detaining Authority under Section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Preventi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitral Tribunal in EPC Contract Dispute — Respondent Failed to Respond to Invocation of Arbitration Clause. Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as Respondent Did Not Object to Appointment Despite Notice....

The applicant, Vedanta Limited, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of an Arbitral Tribunal to resolve disputes arising out of an E...