High Court

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Appellant in Prevention of Corruption Act Case Due to Abse...
Supreme Court Modifies High Court Order Appointing Different Arbitrator Under Se...

Home High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Accused's Petition for Cross-Examination in NI Act Case — Rejection of Section 145(2) Application Set Aside. The Court held that once the accused discloses specific defence in an application under Section 145(2) of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, the Magistrate must allow the application and grant an opportunity for cross-examination....

The Petitioner, Narayan Shivdas Kadam, was an accused in a complaint filed by M/S Shriram Transport Finance Co. Ltd. under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, pending before the learn...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Appointment of Plumber in Health Department — No Right to Appointment Merely on Being Eligible. Petitioner failed to secure minimum qualifying marks in written test and thus had no vested right to be appointed....

The petitioner, Subham Suresh Misale, challenged the appointment of respondent No.3, Kiran Suresh Dongare, to the post of Plumber in the Health Department of Maharashtra. The petitioner had applied pu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Appointment of Plumber in Health Department — No Right to Appointment Despite Higher Marks in Written Test. Selection Process Included Interview and Assessment of Overall Suitability, and Petitioner Could Not Demonstrate Arbitrariness in Selection....

The petitioner, Subham Suresh Misale, filed two writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 9th February 2024 passed by the Maharashtra Administra...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice in Income Tax Case Due to Lack of Fresh Material. Reopening Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Based on Mere Change of Opinion on Provision for Unascertained Liabilities is Invalid....

The petitioner, Bajaj Auto Limited, filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2016-17 on 29 November 2016, declaring total income of Rs. 4,860,25,58,663. The assessment was completed under Sectio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice in Income Tax Case — No Failure to Disclose Material Facts. Reopening Beyond Four Years Invalid Under Section 147/148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 as Original Assessment Under Section 143(3) Was Full and True Disclosure....

The petitioner, Bajaj Auto Limited, filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2016-17 on 29 November 2016 declaring total income of Rs. 4,860,25,58,663. The assessment was completed under Section...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Default Sentence in DV Act Maintenance Case — Sentencing Without Prior Notice Violates Natural Justice. Imprisonment for non-payment of interim maintenance under Section 125(3) CrPC read with Section 28 DV Act requires prior notice and opportunity of hearing before sentencing....

The petitioner, Vikram Ramesh Rughani, challenged an order dated 20 January 2024 passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate in C.C. No. 96/DV/2018, sentencing him to 47 months simple imprisonment for defau...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Appeal in RERA Refund Dispute — Joint Developer Not Liable for Refund of Amounts Not Received. The court held that under Sections 12 and 18 of RERA, only a promoter who has received payment can be directed to refund, and joint and several liability cannot be imposed without statutory basis....

The case involves a dispute under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA) regarding the refund of amounts paid by an allottee to a joint developer. The appellant, Wadhwa Group Ho...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. The plaintiff's readiness and willingness to perform the contract and the suit being within limitation were concurrent findings of fact not open to challenge in second appeal....

The case involves a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) filed by the appellants (defendants) against the judgment and decree dated 27.10.2006 passed in R.A. No.1...

High Court

Karnataka High Court rules that a wife's failure to join husband after a decree for restitution of conjugal rights is not automatically voluntary desertion barring maintenance under Section 125(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The court holds that the right to maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C. is a social welfare measure and cannot be defeated solely by the existence of a civil decree for restitution when the wife alleges cruelty....

The judgment arises from three revision petitions filed by wives whose claims for maintenance under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 were dismissed by Family Courts on the ground th...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurer's Appeal in Employee's Compensation Case — Employer-Employee Relationship and Death in Course of Employment Upheld. Compensation Award of Rs.8,90,480/- with 12% Interest Confirmed Under Employee's Compensation Act, 1923....

The case involves an appeal by Tata AIG General Insurance Co. Ltd. against the judgment and award dated 03.03.2016 passed by the XXI Additional Small Cause Judge and Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Be...

Previous Next

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)

High Court

Sort by:

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Appointment of Plumber in Health Department — No Right to Appointment Merely on Being Eligible. Petitioner failed to secure minimum qualifying marks in written test and thus had no vested right to be appointed....

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice in Income Tax Case Due to Lack of Fresh Material. Reopening Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Based on Mere Change of Opinion on Provision for Unascertained Liabilities is Invalid....

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice in Income Tax Case — No Failure to Disclose Material Facts. Reopening Beyond Four Years Invalid Under Section 147/148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 as Original Assessment Under Section 143(3) Was Full and True Disclosure....

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurer's Appeal in Employee's Compensation Case — Employer-Employee Relationship and Death in Course of Employment Upheld. Compensation Award of Rs.8,90,480/- with 12% Interest Confirmed Under Employee's Compensation Act, 1923....

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

Bombay High Court Dismisses MBBS Student's Writ Petition Seeking Fourth Attempt in Anatomy...

High Court of Bombay Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Tenancy Orders Under Bombay Tenancy ...

Supreme Court Acquits Appellant in Prevention of Corruption Act Case Due to Absence of Pec...

Supreme Court Modifies High Court Order Appointing Different Arbitrator Under Section 11 o...

Supreme Court Upholds Scrutiny Committee Invalidation of Scheduled Tribe Caste Claim but P...

Supreme Court Allows Homebuyers' Appeal and Waives Time Extension Charges Imposed by Devel...

Supreme Court Dismisses Insurer's and Claimant's Appeals in Motor Accident Death Compensat...