Supreme Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Appellant in Sales Tax Matter — Crushed Bone Not Classified as Fertilizer. Citing the distinction between crushed bone and bone meal, the court ruled that crushed bone does not qualify as fertilizer under the Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Act, 1948....

The dispute arose from a sales tax assessment regarding whether crushed bone manufactured by the respondent could be classified as fertilizer under the Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Act, 1948. The appellant...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appellant in Property Dispute Due to Misinterpretation of Registration Requirements. Court Clarifies that Agreement of Reconveyance Does Not Constitute Mortgage by Conditional Sale Under Section 58(c) of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882....

The dispute arose from a sale of land executed by the appellants in favor of the respondents, with an accompanying agreement of reconveyance. The sale deed was executed on 29.11.1966 and registered on...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appellant in Specific Performance Case Due to Unjustified Forfeiture of Advance. Forfeiture of Advance Not Justified as No Damage Suffered and Agreement Not Enforceable Due to Land Acquisition Notification....

The dispute arose from an agreement of sale dated 19.07.1981 between the parties concerning a property in Guntur. The appellant paid an advance of Rs. 50,000/- but failed to pay the balance by the sti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Regarding Insurer's Liability Under Workmen's Compensation Act. The court upheld that a claimant cannot pursue claims under both the Motor Vehicles Act and the Workmen’s Compensation Act simultaneously....

The dispute arose from a claim for compensation following the death of Bangaru Raju in a tractor accident. The claimants filed a petition under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, 1923 against the owner...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Regarding Stamp Duty Assessment — Jurisdiction of Revenue Authority Affirmed. The court affirmed that the Board of Revenue has the authority to review the Collector's decisions under Section 31 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, despite endorsements made under Section 32....

The dispute arose from an appeal concerning the interpretation and application of Sections 31, 32, and 56 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, as amended by the State of Madhya Pradesh, applicable in Chhatt...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Case — Agreement for Sale Validated. The court affirmed the validity of the agreement for sale dated 11.05.1979, rejecting the appellant's claim that it was merely a loan agreement....

The dispute arose from an appeal concerning a specific performance suit related to a property agreement. The appellant, the owner of a residential house in Bangalore, had entered into an agreement for...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Insufficient Allegations Against Director. Citing the necessity for specific averments in complaints under Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the court ruled that mere directorship does not imply liability....

The dispute arose from a complaint filed by a company against the directors of another company for dishonoured cheques issued in relation to an inter-corporate deposit. The appellant, S.M.S. Pharmaceu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Joint Family Property Dispute — No Evidence of Separation Established....

The dispute arose from a property claim involving a joint family, where the appellant sought a share in the property of her deceased father, Kesava Gounder. The litigation began with a suit filed by t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Consumer Protection Commission's Decision in Insurance Claim Dispute — Insurer's Exclusion Clause Not Applicable....

The dispute arose from an insurance claim made by a jewellery business after a theft of 140 grams of jewellery worth Rs. 63,000 occurred. The National Insurance Co. Ltd. (appellant) contested the clai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Punjab Pre-emption Act Case — Invalid Consent Decree Due to Lack of Necessary Party. Citing the necessity of due process in property rights, the court ruled that the consent decree was void as the appellant was not a party to the proceedings....

The case involved an appeal concerning the interpretation of the Punjab Pre-emption Act, 1913, following a judgment by the High Court of Himachal Pradesh. The appellant, Lachhman Dass, contested a con...