Search Results for "zonal classification"

38 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 38 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Manufacturer's Appeals in Central Excise Classification Dispute. Classification of Benzene and Toluene Based on Purity Under Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and Procedural Compliance Under Central Excise Rules, 1944 Were Upheld by Tribunal.

The appeals arose from a common order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) concerning classification and duty demands on...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Bank in Transfer Case — Transfer Order Restored with Alternative Posting Options. Allegations of Malafide Transfer Not Established; Bank's Administrative Exigency Upheld.

The case involves a senior officer of Punjab and Sind Bank, Mrs Durgesh Kuwar, who was appointed as a Probationary Officer in 1998 and promoted to Chi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute Over All-in-One Desktop Computers. Goods Classified as Portable Under Tariff Item 8471 30 10 Based on Weight and Transportability, Affecting Duty Valuation Under Central Excise Act, 1944.

The Supreme Court of India addressed an appeal concerning the classification of Automatic Data Processing Machines, specifically All-in-One Integrated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Revenue Appeals and Allows Assessee Appeals in Customs and Excise Classification Dispute. Classification of goods under Customs Tariff and Central Excise Tariff determined based on technical literature and expert opinion, rejecting revenue's reclassification.

The judgment involves multiple appeals filed by the Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise and by M/s Twenty First Century Wire Rods Ltd. The core i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition of Heritage Market Buildings. Heritage Classification Does Not Bar Demolition for Public Safety Under Section 2(1ea) of Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961.

The petitioners, residents of Mysuru, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the respond...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeals as Not Maintainable in Service Tax Refund Case. The issue of refund under notifications granting exemption for services consumed in SEZ relates to rate of duty, thus appeal lies to Supreme Court under Section 35G(1) of Central Excise Act, 1944.

The case involves a batch of appeals filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, Pune (Revenue) against an order dated 28th March 2013 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition in Land Use Conversion Case — Failure to Consider Application Under Section 14 of Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961. Government Opinion and Notifications Quashed as Arbitrary Exercise of Administrative Powers.

The petitioner, Sapthagiri Educational and Charitable Trust, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to ...