Search Results for "wrongful loss"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "wrongful loss"

452 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 452 result(s)

High Court

High Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Challenge to Arbitral Award Setting Aside Penalties, Termination, and Blacklisting in Sewerage Treatment Plant Contract Dispute

6 Feb 2026

The High Court of Bombay heard cross-petitions challenging an arbitral award dated 18 June 2020 in a dispute between Solapur Municipal Corporation and...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Application in Eviction Suit — Tenant's Right to Contest Decree Not Extinguished by Consent Terms. State Trading Corporation of India Ltd. held not entitled to challenge eviction decree under Order 23 Rule 3A CPC as consent terms were not shown to be unlawful or void.

2 Dec 2025

The case involves a Civil Revision Application filed by the State Trading Corporation of India Ltd. (the applicant/original defendant) against an orde...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals by Successful Resolution Applicant and Union Bank in DHFL Insolvency Case, Upholds Resolution Plan Modifications on Avoidance Applications and Confidentiality. The Court held that the NCLAT exceeded its jurisdiction by modifying the resolution plan approved by the CoC and NCLT regarding avoidance applications, and that the commercial wisdom of the CoC is not subject to judicial review except under Section 30(2) IBC.

1 Apr 2025

The Supreme Court disposed of a batch of appeals arising from the insolvency resolution of Dewan Housing Finance Corporation Limited (DHFL) under the ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Excise Duty Case — Licensee Liable for Duty on Liquor Destroyed in Fire. Absolute liability under Rule 7(11)(a) of UP Bottling of Foreign Liquor Rules, 1969 and Rules 708/709 of UP Excise Manual; act of God no defense.

6 Jan 2022

The case arises from a fire incident on 10.04.2003 at the godown of the respondent company, a distillery licensee, which destroyed 35,642 cases of Ind...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Admiralty Suit — Vessel Arrest Set Aside for Lack of Same Beneficial Ownership. The court held that the arrest of a vessel under admiralty jurisdiction requires proof that the vessel is in the same beneficial ownership as the charterer liable for the claim, and mere common control or management is insufficient.

9 Dec 2019

The case involves a commercial appeal filed by Rainbow Ace Shipping S.A. Panama, the registered owner of the vessel M.V. Rainbow Ace, against an order...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Complaint for Theft of Documents in Corporate Dispute — Internal Audit Reports and Confidential Documents Not 'Stolen' as They Were Obtained Through Legal Proceedings. The Court held that the ingredients of theft under Section 379 IPC are not satisfied when documents are obtained through legal proceedings and used in bona fide litigation, and continuation of criminal proceedings would be an abuse of process.

15 May 2019

The appeals arise from a criminal complaint filed by Birla Corporation Limited (the appellant) against Adventz Investments and Holdings Limited and ot...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Admiralty Suits as Time-Barred Under Limitation Act. Claims for Loss of Vessel and Cargo Filed Beyond Three-Year Limitation Period from Date of Vessel's Sinking.

17 Sep 2018

The judgment concerns two admiralty suits filed in the Bombay High Court. Admiralty Suit No.3 of 2011 was filed by the time charterer of the vessel 'N...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Wrongful Arrest of Vessel Case — Duty to Mitigate Under Section 73 Contract Act Does Not Apply to Undertaking Under Rule 941 of Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1980. The court held that the undertaking under Rule 941 is a contractual obligation independent of the duty to mitigate damages, and the plaintiff must pay damages as per the undertaking without reduction for failure to mitigate.

5 Nov 2014

The case involves an appeal by Rainbow Ace Shipping S.A., the owner of the vessel MV Rainbow Ace, against an order of the learned single Judge of the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Transfer of Investigation in Alleged Offences Against Brother. Court finds no credible material to warrant transfer of investigation to Crime Branch, as police had already conducted inquiry and found no substance in allegations.

27 Jan 2012

The petitioner, Bertram D'Silva, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking directions to the State authorities to a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Set Aside Arrest of Vessel in Admiralty Suit for Bunkers Supply — Holds That Bunkers Are Necessaries and Arrest Valid Under Admiralty Jurisdiction. The court upheld the arrest of M.V. Rainbow Ace for a claim for bunkers supplied as necessaries, affirming the High Court's inherent admiralty jurisdiction.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves an admiralty suit filed by Lufeng Shipping Co. Ltd., a Chinese company, against the vessel M.V. Rainbow Ace, a Panamanian-flag vesse...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)