Search Results for "willful mis-statement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "willful mis-statement"

15 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 15 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Central Excise Cases Involving 100% EOU — Cenvat Credit on Inputs and Capital Goods Allowed Despite Procedural Lapses. Substantial compliance with Central Excise Rules, 2002 and Notification No. 22/2003-CE sufficient for entitlement to Cenvat credit.

10 Jul 2015

The judgment concerns three Central Excise Appeals filed by Shri Dharampal Lalchand Chug and Shri Kamal Lalchand Chug, who are sole proprietors of 100...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Case on Limitation Issue - Extended Period Invoked for Differential Duty Demand Based on Transfer of Advance Licenses. The Court remanded the matter to CESTAT for fresh consideration on whether the assessee's bonafide belief based on a Tribunal decision later reversed by the Supreme Court precludes invocation of extended period under Section 11A(1) proviso of Central Excise Act, 1944.

4 Jul 2023

The present appeals were filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs against the order of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Trib...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Show Cause Notice and Retrospective Amendment to Section 28 of Customs Act, 1962 — Upholds Validity of Officers' Powers and Amendment.

3 Nov 2014

The petitioner, Sunil Gupta, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challenging a show caus...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Condition in Customs Circular Requiring Bank Guarantee for Accredited Importers. Condition Requiring Bank Guarantee for Differential Duty in Provisional Assessment Held Valid as Reasonable Safeguard Under Customs Act, 1962.

8 Nov 2011

The petitioner, Shah Pulp & Paper Mills Limited, challenged the legality and validity of a condition contained in paragraph 7(iii) of a circular issue...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Penalty Case — Strict Compliance Required for Reduced Penalty Under Section 11AC. The benefit of 25% penalty is available only if duty, interest and reduced penalty are paid within 30 days of the original adjudication order, not the Tribunal's order.

25 Jun 2012

The appeal was filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise against the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) which ...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Quashes Show-Cause Notice in GST Input Tax Credit Dispute — Misinterpretation of Section 17(5)(d) of CGST Act, 2017. Transfer of Leasehold Rights of Industrial Plots Held Not to Be 'Construction of Immovable Property' for ITC Reversal.

10 Feb 2026

The petitioner, Niket Bipinbhai Patel, through his power of attorney holder, filed a writ petition before the Gujarat High Court challenging a show-ca...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Trademark Infringement Case — Plaintiff Fails to Establish Prima Facie Case and Guilty of Iniquitous Conduct. The court upheld the Single Judge's refusal of interim injunction under the Trade Marks Act, 1999 and Copyright Act, 1957, finding suppression of facts and lack of evidence of ownership.

6 Apr 2026

The present Commercial Appeal was filed by Laser Shaving India Pvt Ltd (the original plaintiff) against the order dated 25/06/2025 passed by the learn...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Time Limit for Availing Input Tax Credit Under Section 16(4) of CGST Act. The court held that the time limit is mandatory and not directory, and retrospective amendments are valid.

30 Nov -0001

The Bombay High Court, in a batch of writ petitions, addressed the constitutional validity and interpretation of Section 16(4) of the Central Goods an...

High Court

High Court Quashes Penalty on Company Officials Under CGST Act Due to Lack of Personal Liability Evidence and Procedural Flaws. Petitioners Challenge Penalty Order for Fake Input Tax Credit Allegations

25 Feb 2026

The petitioners, employees of M/s. Shemaroo Entertainment Limited, filed a writ petition challenging an order-in-original dated 1 February 2025 that i...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Customs Appeal Against CESTAT Order Setting Aside Penalty and Confiscation. Import of Vessels for Offshore Exploration Not Liable to Penalty Under Customs Act for Alleged Misdeclaration of Value.

13 Jul 2017

The Commissioner of Customs (Imports), Mumbai, filed an appeal under Section 130(1) of the Customs Act, 1962 against a common order dated 14th August ...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)