Search Results for "wholly unjustified suspension"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...
Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Ac...
High Court of Karnataka Allows EPF Organisation's Writ Petition for Priority Pay...

Search Results for "wholly unjustified suspension"

35 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 35 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Partially Allows Petition in Service Law Dispute Regarding Suspension Period Treatment. Court holds that acquittal does not automatically entitle full backwages during suspension, but directs treatment of suspension period as duty for qualifying service and pension purposes under Regulation 75 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation (Service) Regulations, 1989.

25 Mar 2026

The dispute involved a petition filed by a former employee of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) seeking a direction to treat his susp...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Widow's Petition for Family Pension and Regular Pay for Suspension Period in ESI Employee Case. The court held that the suspension period of the deceased employee should be treated as duty, entitling the widow to full pay and allowances and family pension under the Maharashtra Civil Services Rules, 1981.

7 May 2014

The petitioner, Smt. Khairunnissa Rasool Golandaj, is the widow of Late Rasool Gulam Mohammed Golandaj, who was an employee of the Employees State Ins...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Petition Challenging CAT Order Treating Suspension Period as Qualifying Service for Pension. The Court held that under Rules 37 and 50 of the Railway Service (Pension) Rules, 1993, an employee compulsorily retired is entitled to have the suspension period counted as qualifying service for pension.

4 Feb 2014

The respondent, J.S. Kharat, was employed by the Central Railway since 1964 as a Driver 'C'. On 25.12.1985, he was placed under suspension due to invo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Pension Claim in Service Law Dispute — Suspension Period Counted as Qualifying Service Under CCS Pension Rules. Rule 23 of Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 read with Office Memorandum dated 28.02.1976 mandates that suspension period not expressly excluded by order must be treated as qualifying service.

7 Nov 2025

The petitioner, Sahadev Rama Gadling, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the denial of pension by the re...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Lack of Jurisdiction in Bank Guarantee Dispute — Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause in Contract Confers Jurisdiction on Chennai Courts. Plaintiff L&T's Suit Challenging Invocation of Performance Bank Guarantee Dismissed as Bombay High Court Has No Territorial Jurisdiction.

29 Feb 2016

The plaintiff, Larsen & Toubro Limited (L&T), filed a suit in the Bombay High Court seeking a declaration that the invocation of a Performance Bank Gu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Suspension Order in Forgery Case Due to Lack of Enquiry and Retrospective Effect. Suspension of teacher set aside as management failed to conduct proper enquiry and suspension was made retrospective without authority.

27 Jun 2006

The petitioner, Subhag S. Kavi, was employed as a teacher at Respondent No.4 School, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel Vividhlakshi Vidyalaya & Junior College....

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Employee in Service Law Dispute Over Denial of Salary for Suspension Period. Appellate Authority's Order Treating Suspension Period as Dies Non After Setting Aside Removal Found Impermissible Under Punjab Civil Services (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1970.

3 Mar 2022

The dispute involved an employee appointed as a Clerk in the State Transport Department in 1979, who faced criminal cases leading to suspension and re...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Bail Order in Murder Conviction Appeal Due to Lack of Exceptional Circumstances. High Court Erred in Granting Suspension of Sentence Under Section 389 CrPC Without Considering Serious Nature of Offence Under Section 302 IPC and Trial Court Findings.

10 Apr 2026

The dispute arose from a criminal appeal filed by the informant, challenging the High Court's order that suspended the life sentence and granted bail ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Sections 20(1), (2), and (3) under the PC&PNDT Act, 1994. Supreme Court upholds High Court ruling, emphasizing that suspension of hospital registration must be grounded in public interest and proper legal procedures.

4 Mar 2024

The Supreme Court judgment revolves around the suspension of the registration of Dev Hospital, operated by respondent Jashmina Dilip Devda, for allege...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Broker-Client Dispute. Court Upholds Award Directing Payment of Rs.1,58,39,459.87 but Refuses Interest and Costs Under Section 34 of Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996.

4 Sep 2014

The appellant, Harinarayan Bajaj, entered into various share transactions on the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) through the respondent, Madhukar Sheth, w...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)