Search Results for "voyage charter party"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "voyage charter party"

39 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 39 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Determines Liability for Removal of Sunken Barge Wreck Under Section 14 of Indian Ports Act, 1908. Supreme Court Had Earlier Remanded the Matter for Deciding Pure Question of Law Regarding Whom Liability Falls Upon for Clearing the Wreckage.

10 Apr 2026

The case involved a writ petition filed by JSW Steel Limited (formerly ISPAT Industries Limited) challenging the suspension of its permission to use M...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Arrest of Vessel for Maritime Claim Under Admiralty Act, 2017 — Bunker Supply Constitutes Necessaries. The court held that supply of bunkers to a vessel is a maritime claim under Section 4(1)(l) of the Admiralty (Jurisdiction & Settlement of Maritime Claims) Act, 2017, and granted conditional arrest subject to furnishing of security.

6 Feb 2026

The plaintiff, Om Freight Forwarders Limited, a company engaged in freight forwarding and bunker supply, filed a civil suit under the Admiralty (Juris...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Sales Tax Dispute Over Time Charter Agreement — Holds That Time Charter Is a Service Contract, Not Transfer of Right to Use Goods. The Court ruled that a time charter does not involve transfer of possession or control, thus not taxable under Section 5C of Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957.

4 Dec 2019

The appellant, The Great Eastern Shipping Co. Ltd., owned a tug named 'Kumari Tarini' and entered into a Time Charter Agreement dated 8.1.1998 with th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition Seeking Stay of Cancellation of Letter of Award in Tender Dispute. Court holds that disputes arising from pre-contractual stage are not arbitrable and interim relief under Section 9 cannot be granted when no arbitration agreement exists.

30 May 2019

The Petitioner, Provident Multi-Trading Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking interim reli...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act in Demurrage Dispute, Upholding Concurrent Findings Below. Clause 10(v) Held to Create Direct Liability for Demurrage, Not Indemnity, and Counterclaim for Option Cargo Damages Rejected.

21 Dec 2016

The dispute arose from a coal supply contract dated 18 September 1999 between the appellant, an Indian company, and the respondent, an Australian comp...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Upholding Demurrage Claim. Interpretation of Clause 10(v) of Coal Supply Contract as Creating Primary Liability, Not Indemnity, and Binding Effect of Laytime Statement When No Disagreement Raised Within 30 Days Upheld.

21 Dec 2016

The dispute arose out of a contract dated 18 September 1999 between Ultratech Cement Ltd. (appellant, formerly Larsen & Toubro Ltd.) and Sunfield Reso...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award in Distributorship Dispute — Rejects Claim for Loss of Profits for Period Without Written Agreement. The court held that the arbitrator's finding that no implied contract existed for the period 14th June 2006 to 31st March 2007 was not perverse or against public policy under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

9 Jun 2015

The petitioner, Diversey India Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Maintainability of Section 34 Petition Against Foreign Award; Preliminary Objection Raised Pending Determination. Arbitration Agreement Existence and Enforcement of Foreign Award Under Part II Also Examined.

8 Apr 2015

The dispute arose from a voyage charter party dated 13 September 2008 between Aurelia Reederei Eugen Friederich GmbH Schiffahrtsgesellschaft & Company...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Vacation of Arrest of Vessel in Maritime Claim — Charterer's Bareboat Charter Terminated Before Arrest, Vessel Not Owned by Charterer at Time of Arrest. The court held that the arrest of vessel Geowave Commander was invalid as the vessel was not owned by the charterer M/s. Reflect and the sister ship provision under the Admiralty Act did not apply.

10 May 2013

The appellant, Yusuf Abdul Gani, sole proprietor of Jumbo Offshore Enterprises, filed an appeal against the order of the learned Single Judge dated 17...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Demurrage Dispute. Charter Party Agreement's Demurrage Clause Upheld as Petitioner Failed to Prove Excepted Perils.

21 Dec 2012

The petitioner, Steel Authority of India Limited (SAIL), challenged an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, ...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)