Search Results for "voluntary desertion"

22 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 22 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Matrimonial Dispute: Appellant's Offer of Lump Sum Alimony Upholds Supreme Court's Decree of Divorce

This case concerns a long-standing matrimonial dispute between the appellant-husband and respondent-wife, who have been separated since 2008. The marr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Husband's Appeal for Divorce on Grounds of Cruelty and Desertion — Allegations Not Proved Under Section 13(1)(i-a)(i-b) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. Wife's temporary stay at parental home and filing of maintenance petition do not constitute cruelty or desertion.

The appellant-husband, Shri Amit, filed a petition under Section 13(1)(i-a) and (i-b) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, seeking dissolution of his marr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Husband's Appeals Against Restitution of Conjugal Rights Decree and Dismissal of Divorce Petition. Husband Failed to Prove Cruelty or Desertion; Wife's Refusal to Stay with In-Laws Not Unreasonable.

The case involves two appeals filed by the husband, Rakesh Jaiswal, against the judgments of the Family Court, Aurangabad. The first appeal (FCA No. 8...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Wife's Appeal Against Divorce Decree in Cruelty Case. Marriage Dissolved Under Section 13 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 on Grounds of Mental Cruelty and Desertion.

The appellant, Savithri, wife of S. Ravindra Reddy, filed an appeal under Section 19(1) of the Family Courts Act against the judgment and decree dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals by Wife and Co-Respondent, Upholds Divorce Decree on Grounds of Adultery, Desertion, and Cruelty Under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. Wife's Voluntary Sexual Intercourse with Co-Respondent and Desertion Established by Preponderance of Probabilities.

The case involves two family court appeals arising from a divorce petition filed by Sushil (husband) against Sangeeta (wife) under Section 13(1)(i), (...