Bombay High Court Allows Husband's Appeal for Divorce on Grounds of Cruelty and Desertion Under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 — Compromise Failed as Wife Returned to Parents After One Month. The court held that the wife's conduct after compromise, including a short stay and subsequent departure, constituted cruelty and desertion under Section 13(1)(i-a) and (iii) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 7
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant-husband filed a petition under Section 13(1)(i-a) and (iii) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, seeking dissolution of his marriage with the respondent-wife on grounds of cruelty and desertion. The Family Court, Aurangabad, dismissed the petition. During the pendency of the appeal, a compromise was reached in Regular Civil Suit No. 46/2012, a partition suit filed by the couple's daughter, wherein the husband agreed to maintain the wife and daughter and to resume cohabitation. The wife returned to the matrimonial home but stayed only for about one month before leaving again to her parents' house. The husband argued that this short stay and subsequent departure constituted cruelty and desertion. The court noted that the compromise indicated an intention to resume cohabitation, but the wife's failure to stay and her departure after a month amounted to cruelty and desertion. The court allowed the appeal, setting aside the trial court's judgment and decree, and granted a decree of divorce dissolving the marriage.

Headnote

A) Family Law - Divorce - Cruelty and Desertion - Section 13(1)(i-a) and (iii) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Husband filed for divorce alleging cruelty and desertion - Trial court dismissed petition - During appeal, parties entered into compromise in a partition suit where husband agreed to maintain wife and daughter and resume cohabitation - Wife returned but stayed only one month before leaving again - Held that the wife's conduct after compromise amounts to cruelty and desertion, and divorce is granted (Paras 2-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the husband is entitled to divorce on grounds of cruelty and desertion under Section 13(1)(i-a) and (iii) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, after a failed compromise where the wife returned to her parents' home after one month of cohabitation.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal allowed. Judgment and decree of Family Court, Aurangabad in Hindu Marriage Petition No. A-334/2004 set aside. Marriage between appellant and respondent dissolved by decree of divorce.

Law Points

  • Cruelty
  • Desertion
  • Divorce
  • Hindu Marriage Act
  • 1955
  • Section 13(1)(i-a)
  • Section 13(1)(iii)
  • Compromise
  • Cohabitation
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (09) 54

Family Court Appeal No. 4 of 2008

2017-09-14

T.V. Nalawade, S.M. Gavhane

Mr. P.P. Mandlik (h/f Mr. P.V. Mandlik, Senior Counsel) for appellant

Dnyaneshwar s/o. Sheshrao Patange

Sow. Swati w/o. Dnyaneshwar Patange

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against dismissal of divorce petition under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

Remedy Sought

Husband sought dissolution of marriage on grounds of cruelty and desertion.

Filing Reason

Husband alleged cruelty and desertion by wife.

Previous Decisions

Family Court, Aurangabad dismissed Hindu Marriage Petition No. A-334/2004.

Issues

Whether the wife's conduct after compromise amounts to cruelty and desertion under Section 13(1)(i-a) and (iii) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that wife returned to matrimonial home after compromise but stayed only one month and left again, constituting cruelty and desertion.

Ratio Decidendi

The wife's conduct after compromise, where she returned to cohabitation for only one month and then left, amounts to cruelty and desertion, entitling the husband to divorce under Section 13(1)(i-a) and (iii) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

Judgment Excerpts

In the compromise dated 3.7.2012 present petitioner has agreed to maintain and take care of respondent and daughter and some portion of the ancestral property is also given to the daughter by present petitioner. the wife had returned to the matrimonial house, but there was short stay, of hardly one month and she again returned back to the house of her parents.

Procedural History

Husband filed Hindu Marriage Petition No. A-334/2004 in Family Court, Aurangabad under Section 13(1)(i-a) and (iii) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for divorce. Petition dismissed. Husband appealed to High Court. During appeal, compromise in Regular Civil Suit No. 46/2012. Wife returned for one month then left. High Court allowed appeal and granted divorce.

Acts & Sections

  • Hindu Marriage Act, 1955: 13(1)(i-a), 13(1)(iii)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Husband's Appeal for Divorce on Grounds of Cruelty and Desertion Under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 — Compromise Failed as Wife Returned to Parents After One Month. The court held that the wife's conduct after compromise, inclu...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Supplementary Charge-Sheet for Lack of Prior Permission Under Section 173(8) CrPC. Investigating Officer's Failure to Seek Magistrate's Leave Renders Further Investigation Invalid.