Search Results for "void sub-lease"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "void sub-lease"

15 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 15 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Plaintiff's Appeal; Sub-Lessee Inducted Contrary to Section 73 of Act 66 of 1950 Does Not Acquire Occupancy Rights Under Section 185 of M.P. Land Revenue Code, 1959. Court Rules That a Person Declared Trespasser Under Section 78 of Act 66 of 1950 Is Not a Ryotwari Sub-Lessee Protected by Act 29 of 1955 and Cannot Claim Occupancy Tenant Status.

6 Oct 1969

The dispute concerned agricultural land bearing Khasra Nos. 33 and 34 of Maheshwar, District Khargone, Madhya Pradesh. The plaintiff, Nathu Prasad, wa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Applications in Rent Control Dispute — Licence vs. Lease Determination. Court upholds findings that agreement was a lease under Transfer of Property Act, not a licence, and that tenant sublet premises without consent, violating Bombay Rent Act.

8 Jan 2016

The case involves two Civil Revision Applications filed by Messrs Miscellenary Marketers Pvt. Ltd. (defendants) against Messrs SunNSand Pvt. Ltd. (pla...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Applications in Rent Control Dispute — Licence vs. Lease Determination Under Bombay Rent Act, 1947. Agreement for use of shop premises held to be a lease, not a licence, based on exclusive possession and intention of parties.

8 Jan 2016

The case involves two Civil Revision Applications filed by Messrs Miscellenary Marketers Pvt. Ltd. (defendants) against Messrs SunNSand Pvt. Ltd. (pla...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Application for Rejection of Plaint Based on Unregistered Lease and Determination of Lease. Court Examines Whether Plaint Discloses Cause of Action for Specific Performance and Monetary Claims Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.

4 Mar 2014

The case involved a suit for specific performance and a money decree filed by Export Credit Guarantee Corporation of India Ltd (plaintiff) against the...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Arbitral Award in Lease Dispute — Lessee's Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Patent Illegality. The court held that the arbitral tribunal's interpretation of the lease agreement and findings on breach of contract were plausible and not perverse, thus not warranting interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996.

21 Nov 2025

The appellant, Godolphine India Private Limited (formerly Darvesh Industries India Pvt Ltd), filed a commercial appeal under Section 37(1)(c) of the A...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Specific Performance Case — Agreement to Sell Void Under Section 61 of Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961. Agreement executed during non-alienation period is void ab initio and not enforceable even after the restriction period ends.

26 Sep 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the defendants (appellants) against the judgment of the Karnataka High Court which had upheld the decre...

High Court

Bombay High Court Addresses Interim Applications in Redevelopment Contract Dispute Between Developer and Partner. The Court Examines Injunctions Against Termination and Alienation of Property Under the Specific Relief Act.

27 Jun 2013

The plaintiff, Shapoorji Pallonji & Company Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1913, filed Suit No. 1512 of 2009 before the Bombay ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Recall/Review of Order Allowing Secured Creditor to Release Leasehold Rights. Applicant, an ex-director and guarantor, lacked locus standi as he was not a party to the original application and no fraud or mistake was established.

30 Jul 2013

The judgment concerns an application filed by Mr Shashikant Pasari, an ex-director and guarantor of Rajan (Textile) Mills Pvt Ltd (in liquidation), se...

High Court

NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 443 OF 2012

27 Jun 2013

The matter arises out of Suit No. 1512 of 2009 before the Bombay High Court, filed by Shapoorji Pallonji & Company Ltd. against Jignesh Shah, Aruna Sh...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment to Plaint in Suit for Compensation and Declaration of Sale Agreement as Void. Amendment Sought to Challenge Agreement for Sale of Property Allegedly Purchased with Siphoned Funds Allowed Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC.

5 Sep 2019

The Plaintiff, Edit II Productions, filed a suit seeking compensation for financial loss caused by the Defendants who allegedly siphoned funds from th...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)