Search Results for "village recognition"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "village recognition"

211 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 211 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Village Recognition Dispute — Inter-District Boundary Dispute Not a Valid Ground to Keep Recognition in Abeyance. Formal recognition of a village cannot be withheld indefinitely pending resolution of an inter-district boundary dispute where the village has fulfilled all other criteria under the O.M. dated 22.03.1996 and O.M. dated 01.10.2005.

23 May 2025

The dispute pertains to the recognition of a village in Nagaland. The appellant, Old Jalukai Village Council, opposed the recognition of respondent no...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Challenging Wakf Board Notification Including Service Inam Lands in Dargah Property. Errata Notification Adding Lands to Wakf Property Upheld as Valid Exercise of Power Under Wakf Act, 1995.

7 Feb 2022

The Supreme Court dismissed a batch of civil appeals challenging an order of the Andhra Pradesh High Court that upheld an Errata Notification issued b...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Maintainability of Successive Recognition Application Under Section 14 of MRTU & PULP Act. No One-Year Bar Exists After Disposal of Previous Application; Only Bar is Within One Year of Recognition of Another Union.

2 Feb 2005

The case involves a challenge by the Petitioner Union, Kamgar Utkarsha Sabha, which was a recognized trade union in the undertaking of Respondent No.2...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Zilla Parishad's Permission to Start 8th Std. Classes - Right to Education Act, 2009 Does Not Prohibit Local Authority from Opening New Classes. The court held that the Government Resolution on distance restrictions applies only to private schools, not to local authority schools, and no hearing is required to be given to a private school before granting such permission.

3 Aug 2017

The petitioner, Vidhya Vikas Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, which runs Shriman Dagduba Shingare Secondary School at village Sanja, Osmanabad, challenged an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Revision in Eviction Suit for Unauthorized Subletting. Concurrent findings of fact that tenant sublet premises without landlord's consent under Section 15 of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999, upheld.

8 Mar 2013

The Khadi and Village Industries Commission (KVIC), a statutory body, was a monthly tenant of a godown premises in Mumbai owned by the respondents (la...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging School Closure Under RTE Act — Lack of Standing and Failure to Exhaust Statutory Remedies. Petitioner, a resident without parental interest, cannot maintain writ petition under Article 226 for alleged violation of Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009, as remedy lies before appropriate authority under Section 32 of the Act.

7 Aug 2014

The petitioner, Shri Arun Shivaji Chavare, a resident of Ghanegaon, Taluka Barshi, District Solapur, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Co...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Termination of Assistant Teachers in Ashram Schools — Violation of Natural Justice and Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977. Termination orders set aside as petitioners were not given opportunity of hearing and provisions of M.E.P.S. Act were not followed.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by a group of Assistant Teachers working in various Ashram Schools in Maharashtra. The petitioners were...

High Court

Court Quashes State Decision to Shift Navi Mumbai Sports Complex, Reaffirms Public Interest. Judgment emphasizes the importance of accessible sports facilities, criticizes arbitrary land reallocation for commercial use, and mandates CIDCO to hand over land for the original sports complex.

1 Jul 2024

The Public Interest Litigation (PIL) by the Indian Institute of Architects, Navi Mumbai Center, challenges the allocation of land originally designate...

High Court

State Government’s Shift of Sports Complex to Rural Area Quashed. Court Orders CIDCO to Revert Land for Sports Complex Development, Emphasizing Public Interest and Transparency

1 Jul 2024

The State Government's decision to relocate the Government Sports Complex from Navi Mumbai to a rural area for commercial exploitation has been critic...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Directs State to Allot Forest Land to Scheduled Tribe Dwellers Under Forest Rights Act, 2006 — Failure to Act on Government Order Violates Constitutional Rights. The court held that the State is bound to implement its own order for allotment of land under the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006, and directed allotment within four weeks.

23 Mar 2026

The petitioners, eight individuals belonging to the Scheduled Tribe community, filed three writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of Ind...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)