Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Zilla Parishad's Permission to Start 8th Std. Classes - Right to Education Act, 2009 Does Not Prohibit Local Authority from Opening New Classes. The court held that the Government Resolution on distance restrictions applies only to private schools, not to local authority schools, and no hearing is required to be given to a private school before granting such permission.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD
  • 12
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Vidhya Vikas Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, which runs Shriman Dagduba Shingare Secondary School at village Sanja, Osmanabad, challenged an order dated 25.05.2017 passed by the Education Officer (Primary), Zilla Parishad, Osmanabad, permitting the Zilla Parishad school at the same village to operate 8th std. classes from the academic year 2017-18. The petitioner had been running a secondary school (8th to 10th std.) since 2009. The petitioner contended that the distance between the two schools was approximately 1600 meters, and that the permission violated the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 and a Government Resolution dated 02.07.2013 which imposed distance restrictions for establishing new schools. The petitioner also argued that it was not given an opportunity of hearing before the permission was granted. The court examined the provisions of the Act of 2009, particularly Sections 6 and 18, and the Government Resolution. It noted that Section 6 of the Act casts a duty on the appropriate government and local authorities to establish schools within a specified area, and Section 18 deals with recognition of schools. The court held that the Act does not prohibit a local authority from opening new classes or schools. The Government Resolution dated 02.07.2013, which provides for distance restrictions, applies only to schools established by private management, not to schools established by local authorities. The court further held that no hearing is required to be given to a private school before granting permission to a local authority to start new classes. The petition was dismissed as devoid of merit.

Headnote

A) Education Law - Right to Free and Compulsory Education - Sections 6, 18 of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 - Permission to start 8th std. classes by Zilla Parishad - Petitioner, a private school, objected to Zilla Parishad starting 8th std. classes in the same village, citing distance restrictions and lack of hearing - Court held that the Act of 2009 does not prohibit a local authority from opening new classes or schools, and the Government Resolution regarding distance restrictions applies only to private schools, not to schools established by local authorities - Further, no hearing is required to be given to a private school before granting permission to a local authority - Petition dismissed (Paras 1-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the permission granted to Zilla Parishad to start 8th std. classes is in accordance with the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 and whether the petitioner was entitled to a hearing before such permission.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is dismissed. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act
  • 2009
  • Section 6
  • Section 18
  • Government Resolution dated 02.07.2013
  • distance restrictions
  • opportunity of hearing
  • local authority school
  • private school
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (08) 12

Writ Petition No. 8366 of 2017

2017-08-03

R. M. Borde, A. M. Dhavale

Mr S. T. Veer for petitioner, Mrs M. A. Deshpande, AGP for respondent/State

Vidhya Vikas Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, through its President Shri. Chandrakant S/o Pandhari Hajgude

The State of Maharashtra, The Director of Education, The Deputy Director of Education, The Education Officer (Primary), Zilla Parishad, Osmanabad

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging permission granted to Zilla Parishad to start 8th std. classes.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of order dated 25.05.2017 permitting Zilla Parishad to start 8th std. classes.

Filing Reason

Petitioner objected to Zilla Parishad starting 8th std. classes in the same village, citing distance restrictions and lack of hearing.

Previous Decisions

In 2014, petitioner had objected to a similar attempt by Zilla Parishad, and the local authority did not proceed.

Issues

Whether the permission granted to Zilla Parishad to start 8th std. classes violates the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009? Whether the petitioner was entitled to a hearing before the permission was granted?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the permission violates the Act of 2009 and Government Resolution dated 02.07.2013 regarding distance restrictions. Petitioner contended that no opportunity of hearing was given before granting permission.

Ratio Decidendi

The Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 does not prohibit a local authority from opening new classes or schools. The Government Resolution dated 02.07.2013 regarding distance restrictions applies only to private schools, not to schools established by local authorities. No hearing is required to be given to a private school before granting permission to a local authority to start new classes.

Judgment Excerpts

The Act of 2009 does not prohibit the local authority from opening new classes or schools. The Government Resolution dated 02.07.2013 provides for distance restrictions for operating another school in the event of establishment of any other school by private management. No hearing is required to be given to a private school before granting permission to a local authority to start new classes.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 8366 of 2017 in the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, challenging the order dated 25.05.2017 passed by the Education Officer (Primary), Zilla Parishad, Osmanabad. The petition was heard and dismissed on 03.08.2017.

Acts & Sections

  • Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009: Section 6, Section 18
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Zilla Parishad's Permission to Start 8th Std. Classes - Right to Education Act, 2009 Does Not Prohibit Local Authority from Opening New Classes. The court held that the Government Resolution on distanc...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Petition by Employer in Industrial Dispute — Upholds Dismissal of Workman After Fair Domestic Enquiry. Labour Court's Interference Set Aside as Enquiry Was Proper and Punishment Not Disproportionate Under Industrial Dispute...