Search Results for "video games"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "video games"

18 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 18 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Four Accused in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Last Seen Theory. Conviction under Sections 302, 326, 324 read with Section 34 IPC confirmed as prosecution proved chain of circumstances leading to the murder of the deceased.

6 Dec 2016

The case involves four appellants who were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, for the murder of one person and causing injuries to othe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Charge-Sheet Against Video Game Parlour Owner in Gambling Case — Video Games Not Gambling Without Wagering. Licence Under Bombay Entertainments Act Does Not Authorize Gambling, and Mere Running of Video Games Without Proof of Betting Does Not Attract Section 12(a) of Bombay Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887.

29 Jul 2011

The petitioner, Kailash Shreekisan Chaurasia, owned and operated a video game parlour named 'Dream World Video Game Parlour' in Warud, District Amrava...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Amusement Park Duty Dispute — Concessional Rate Under Section 3(5)(a) of Bombay Entertainments Duty Act, 1923 Not Further Reducible by Section 3(2). The court held that a general admission ticket to an amusement park does not qualify as a lump sum payment for a series of entertainments under Section 3(2), so the duty for the fourth and fifth years is 7.5%.

18 Feb 2020

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the State of Maharashtra against the judgment of the Bombay High Court. The dispute concerned the rate ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 377 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of POCSO Act set aside as testimonies of child victims were contradictory and unsupported by medical evidence.

25 Jun 2018

The appellant, Navin Dhaniram Baraiye, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Special POCSO Case No. 218/2016 for offences under Se...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Directors of Housing Society in Cheque Dishonour Case — No Vicarious Liability Without Specific Role in Day-to-Day Affairs. Directors of a cooperative housing society cannot be held vicariously liable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for dishonour of cheques issued by the society unless they are shown to be in charge of and responsible for the conduct of the business of the society at the time of the offence.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, who were Directors of a cooperative housing society, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Entertainment Duty on Amusement Park Admission Fee. Lumpsum Charge for Entry and Entertainment is Subject to Duty Under Bombay Entertainment Duty Act, 1923.

19 Dec 2006

The petitioners, Pan India Paryatan Limited and its director, owned and operated an amusement park in Greater Bombay which opened to the public on 25t...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in POCSO Case for Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault of Minor — Life Sentence Confirmed. Court holds that minor inconsistencies in victim's testimony do not undermine credibility when corroborated by medical evidence and prompt complaint.

10 Mar 2026

The appellant-accused, Tabrez Rojuddin Ansari, was convicted by the learned Special Judge and Additional Sessions Judge, Bharuch in Special POCSO Case...

High Court

High Court Upholds Entertainment Duty on APSARA Award Function; Deletes Penalty. Petitioner's challenge to entertainment duty dismissed, penalty reduced due to legal interpretation issues.

20 Jun 2024

This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenges the order dated 28th September 2007, confirming an entertainment duty demand o...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition for Refund of Rs.27.51 Crore Collected Under Coercion in GST Investigation — Mandamus Issued for Unlawful Recovery Without Adjudication. Court Holds That Recovery Without Adjudication Is Illegal and Violative of Article 265, and Directs Refund With Interest.

14 Sep 2021

The petitioner, M/s. Bundl Technologies Private Limited, a company engaged in e-commerce, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Initiates Suo Motu Contempt Proceedings Against Media Houses for Scandalous Reporting on Judicial Officers. The court convicted editors and reporters of news channels and a newspaper for criminal contempt under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for publishing allegations of bias and corruption against judges without any factual basis.

28 Jan 2020

The High Court of Karnataka initiated suo motu criminal contempt proceedings against two sets of accused: (1) owners, editors, and representatives of ...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)