Search Results for "vanaspati"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "vanaspati"

24 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 24 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Britannia Industries Ltd. Against Bombay Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee Regarding Applicability of APMC Act to Processed Products. Court Holds That Sugar, Edible Oil, and Vanaspati Are 'Agricultural Produce' Under Section 2(1)(a) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963, and Market Fees Can Only Be Levied on Transactions Within the Market Area.

24 Jan 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals by Britannia Industries Ltd. challenging the applicability of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition for Cancellation of Bank Guarantee Kept Alive for 21 Years in Edible Oils Confiscation Case — Unreasonable Delay and Failure to Prosecute Justify Release of Security. The court held that keeping a bank guarantee alive for over two decades without any progress in the criminal case is unreasonable and warrants interference under Article 226 and Section 482 Cr.P.C.

5 Oct 2006

The petitioner, Kanji Kalyanji & Co., a firm, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the Cod...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Market Fee Levy on Tobacco Products Under APMC Act — Tobacco Products Held Not Exempt as 'Manufactured Product' Under Section 2(1)(a) of Bombay Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1939. Processing of tobacco into chewing tobacco or gutka does not transform it into a manufactured product; market fee is leviable.

24 Apr 2006

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by companies and their shareholders challenging the levy of market fee on tobacco products under the Bo...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Food Adulteration Case: Remand Order Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice. High Court's order setting aside conviction and ordering retrial against company without notice violates Section 401(2) CrPC.

1 Jan 2020

The Supreme Court allowed two appeals arising from a High Court order that set aside the conviction of a nominated officer of Hindustan Unilever Limit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Against Dabur in Disparagement and Trademark Infringement Suit Over Amla Hair Oil Advertisements. The court held that the defendant's television commercial disparaged the plaintiff's 'Nihar' amla hair oil by falsely implying inferiority, violating principles of comparative advertising under trademark law.

4 Dec 2019

The plaintiff, Marico Limited, a manufacturer of household brands including 'Nihar' amla hair oil, filed a commercial IP suit alleging that the defend...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Market Fee on Confectionery and Food Drinks Under APMC Act. Confectionery and Food Drinks Are Not 'Agricultural Produce' Under Section 2(a) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963, and Hence Not Subject to Market Fee.

18 Aug 2017

The petitioner, Cadbury India Limited, a company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1956, manufactures confectionery and food drinks at its ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Share Dispute Case — Allegations of Cheating and Forgery Found Baseless as Shares Were Jointly Held and Not Purchased by Complainant. The Court held that the complaint did not disclose any offence under Sections 406, 420, 467, 471, 323, 504, 506, 447, 448 IPC and quashed the proceedings under Section 482 CrPC.

8 Jan 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and quashed the criminal proceedings against the appellants. The background of the case involves a family dispute...

High Court

Bombay High Court Admits Writ Petition Challenging Special Audit Order Under Section 142(2A) of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Issue of Pre-decisional Hearing Referred to Larger Bench. The court admitted the petition as the same legal issue regarding the necessity of a hearing before a special audit direction was already pending in another admitted writ petition.

7 Mar 2006

The petitioner, Atlas Copco (India) Limited, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 11th November 2005 passed by the Assistant Commissioner ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Dispute Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Limitation. Court upholds concurrent findings of courts below that appellants failed to prove title and possession over suit property.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a property dispute between the appellants (original plaintiffs) and the respondents (original defendants) over a piece of land in Po...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Appeals: Exemption from Market Fee and Rural Development Fee Under 2003 Policy

15 Jul 2024

These appeals challenge the Punjab & Haryana High Court's judgments concerning the exemption from Market fee and Rural Development fee sought by t...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)