Search Results for "user development fee"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...
Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Ac...
High Court of Karnataka Allows EPF Organisation's Writ Petition for Priority Pay...

Search Results for "user development fee"

64 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 64 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue Appeals in Service Tax on Airport Development Fee Case. User Development Fee Collected by Airport Operators Under Statutory Authority is Not Subject to Service Tax Under Finance Act, 1994.

19 May 2023

The Supreme Court considered appeals by the revenue against CESTAT orders that had held user development fee collected by airport operators not liable...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Development Charge Levy in Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act. The court held that the levy is a fee for services rendered and not a tax, and the amendment is within legislative competence.

13 Jun 2005

The petitioners, The Solapur Promoters and Builders Association Society and another, challenged the constitutional validity of the Maharashtra Regiona...

High Court

State Government’s Shift of Sports Complex to Rural Area Quashed. Court Orders CIDCO to Revert Land for Sports Complex Development, Emphasizing Public Interest and Transparency

1 Jul 2024

The State Government's decision to relocate the Government Sports Complex from Navi Mumbai to a rural area for commercial exploitation has been critic...

High Court

Court Quashes State Decision to Shift Navi Mumbai Sports Complex, Reaffirms Public Interest. Judgment emphasizes the importance of accessible sports facilities, criticizes arbitrary land reallocation for commercial use, and mandates CIDCO to hand over land for the original sports complex.

1 Jul 2024

The Public Interest Litigation (PIL) by the Indian Institute of Architects, Navi Mumbai Center, challenges the allocation of land originally designate...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging CIDCO's Revaluation of Lease Premium and Ground Rent for Commercial Plots. The court upheld CIDCO's power to revise lease terms based on current market rates under the Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961, rejecting claims of estoppel and legitimate expectation.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by commercial plot allottees in Navi Mumbai challenging the decision of the City and Industrial Devel...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Demolition Notices Issued by Nagpur Improvement Trust for Alleged Unauthorized Construction. Court holds that show cause notices under Section 53 of the Nagpur Improvement Trust Act, 1936 must be served on the owner or person in possession, and that the Trust cannot demolish without giving an opportunity of hearing.

19 Mar 2012

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by owners of flats in Nagpur challenging demolition notices issued by the Nagpur Improvement Trust (N...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Judgment Directing Shift of Toll Plaza for Violation of National Highways Fee Rules. Construction at 194 km of NH30 Found to Violate Rule 8 of National Highways Fee (Determination of Rates and Collection) Rules, 2008 Due to Lack of Written Reasons and Failure to Meet Conditions for Municipal Area Placement.

23 Sep 2021

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by respondents 1 to 17 (writ petitioners) seeking to restrain the construction of a toll plaza at 194 km ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Demand Notice for Unauthorized Change of Land Use in Leasehold Property — Petitioners Not Liable for Unauthorized Use by Tenant Without Prior Permission. Leasehold Property Dispute Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 — Demand for Additional Premium and Penalty Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice.

18 Oct 2006

The petitioners, Tulsiram Rangwala Trust, Rikhiram T. Arora, and Shivram Enterprises (India) Pvt. Ltd., challenged a demand notice dated 30th March 20...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes State Order Demanding 100% Ready Reckoner Valuation for Regularisation of Change of User in Land Conveyance Case. Court holds that premium for regularisation of non-agricultural use and conveyance must be calculated based on the policy in force at the time of application, not subsequent higher rates.

8 Jun 2026

The petitioner, M/s. M.P. Homes, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 11.11.2020 passed by the State of Maharashtra (Respondent No.1) dire...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Market Committee in Market Fee Dispute: Processed Agricultural Produce Imported from Outside State is Liable for Market Fee Under Karnataka APMC Act. The Court held that the Explanation to Section 65(2) of the Karnataka APMC Act excludes the exemption for imported agricultural produce, and the importer is liable to pay market fee under Section 65(2-A)(ia).

14 Dec 2021

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by APMC Yashwanthapura against the judgment of the Karnataka High Court which had held that the respondent,...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)