High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Appeals Filed Against Single Judge Order in Land Acquisition Matters Involving KIADB. Appeals Challenge Order Dated 04.07.2025 in Various Writ Petitions Filed by Landowners and Developers.
29 Jul 2026...
Search Results for "urban infrastructure"
491 result(s) found
Found 491 result(s)
High Court
- 18
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Public Interest Litigation to Protect Land for Government Sports Complex at Navi Mumbai. CIDCO's commercial allotment of land earmarked for sports complex quashed; State Government's decision to shift complex to remote location set aside.
1 Jul 2024The Bombay High Court was hearing a Public Interest Litigation filed by the Indian Institute of Architects, Navi Mumbai Center, challenging the action...
- 421
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Public Interest Litigation Seeking Preservation of Land for Government Sports Complex at Navi Mumbai — Directs Restoration of Earmarked Land and Cancellation of Allotment to Private Developer. Land reserved since 2003 under Government Resolution dated 26 March 2003 for a Government Sports Complex cannot be diverted for commercial purposes; shifting the complex to a remote rural area 115 km away is arbitrary.
1 Jul 2024The Indian Institute of Architects, Navi Mumbai Center, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court challenging the actions of CID...
- 675
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Ban on Apartmentalisation in Chandigarh Residential Plots to Preserve City's Original Character. Fragmentation of single dwelling units into multiple apartments violates Rule 16 of Chandigarh Estate Rules, 2007 and the Chandigarh Master Plan 2031.
10 Jan 2023The case involves a Public Interest Litigation filed by the Chandigarh Citizens Forum (appellants) against the Chandigarh Administration and others, s...
- 335
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Stay Application in Arbitral Award Challenge — No Automatic Stay Under Section 36 of Arbitration Act Without Strong Prima Facie Case. Court holds that mere filing of Section 34 petition does not warrant stay; applicant must demonstrate irreparable harm and balance of convenience.
14 Dec 2020The judgment concerns an interim application filed by Kishor N Shah and others (the Shahs) under Section 36 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1...
- 49
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Winding Up Orders in Company Law Dispute — Failure to Discharge Debt and Lack of Bona Fide Dispute Justify Winding Up Under Sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956. The court held that the appellants had no genuine dispute regarding the debt and the winding up petitions were maintainable.
9 Mar 2016The judgment pertains to three appeals filed by Neelkanth Devansh Developers Private Limited, Neelkanth Soham Developers Private Limited, and Neelkant...
- 135
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Notifications Under Act of 2013 for Rural Water Storage Tank — Multiplier of Two Not Applicable. Court holds that Section 26 read with First Schedule of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 does not mandate multiplier of two for rural land acquisition as the land is not in an urban area.
9 Mar 2015The petitioner, Panjabrao Borade, filed a writ petition challenging notifications dated 19.3.2014 and 13.8.2014 issued by the Deputy Secretary to the ...
- 285
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Disallowance Under Section 40(a)(ia) Not Applicable When TDS Deducted and Paid Before Due Date of Filing Return Under Section 139(1). The court upheld the ITAT's order deleting disallowance, holding that the proviso to Section 40(a)(ia) allows deduction if TDS is paid before the due date under Section 139(1).
28 Feb 2014The case involves three appeals filed by the Revenue under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the common order of the Income Tax Appel...
- 56
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Revenue Appeal in Section 80IA Deduction Case for Container Handling Cranes. Leasing of cranes to JNPT does not constitute developing, maintaining and operating an infrastructural facility under Section 80IA of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
15 Feb 2010The case involves appeals filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal f...
- 60
