Search Results for "unwillingness"

226 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 226 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Senior Teacher Challenging Tribunal Order Setting Aside Promotion as Head Master. Initial Unwillingness for Promotion Does Not Bar Subsequent Willingness When No Appointment Made, Under MEPS Rules.

The petitioner, Bhimrao Keshao Telang, was promoted to the post of Head Master of a school by an order dated 23 April 1997. Respondent No.1, Prabhudas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Specific Performance Appeal Despite Unproven Part Payment. Failure to Prove Payment of Rs.300 Does Not Justify Refusal of Specific Performance When Plaintiff Shows Readiness and Willingness.

The appellant-plaintiff filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale dated 6th June 1974, whereby the respondent-defendant agreed to...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Convict's Furlough Petition Due to Previous Absconding Behavior. Rejection of furlough application upheld as petitioner had earlier absconded and was arrested, constituting a valid ground under Bombay Furlough and Parole Rules, 1959.

The petitioner, Murlidhar Ramchandra Bhalerao, a convict lodged in Central Prison, Nagpur, filed a Criminal Writ Petition challenging the rejection of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal for Specific Performance of Agreement to Sell, Upholds Refund of Earnest Money. Court finds that the plaintiff failed to prove readiness and willingness to perform its part of the contract under Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The appellant, M/s. Dreams Construction Private Limited, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell a land admeasuring 1 Hector and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order Passed Without Proper Compliance of Section 56(1)(b) of the Maharashtra Police Act. Sub-Divisional Magistrate Must Independently Form Opinion Regarding Witnesses' Apprehension, Not Rely on Police Officer's Notice.

The petitioner, threatened with externment, challenged the order of the Divisional Commissioner confirming the Sub-Divisional Magistrate's externment ...