Search Results for "trivial incidents"

53 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 53 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Acquits Appellants in Criminal Appeal. Conviction Under Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Goa Children's Act, 2003 Set Aside Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Property Dispute

The Appellants, were convicted by the Children's Court for offences under Section 504 and 324 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Dowry Harassment Case Due to Settlement Between Parties — Section 498A IPC and Section 4 Dowry Prohibition Act. Compromise reached between husband and wife leads to quashing of FIR and all proceedings in C.C.No.15166/2020.

The petitioners, who are the husband (accused No.1), mother-in-law (accused No.2), and father-in-law (accused No.3), filed a criminal petition under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by CRPF Against Reinstatement of Constable Who Suppressed Criminal Antecedents. Termination Upheld as Respondent Willfully Concealed Pending Cases and Submitted Forged Documents.

The case involves an appeal by the Director General of the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) and others against a judgment of the Gauhati High Court...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Copyright Infringement Claim Against Film 'Umeed' — No Substantial Similarity Found. Court holds that ideas and themes are not copyrightable under the Copyright Act, 1957, and that the plaintiff failed to establish access or copying.

The plaintiff, Shivani Tibrewala, a writer/director, filed a suit alleging copyright infringement by the defendants, Rajat Mukherjee and others, in re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Sanction and Inconsistent Evidence. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Eknath s/o Laxman Gaikwad, was a Lineman (Assistant Lineman) employed at the Fuse Call Centre of Maharashtra State Electricity Board (M...