Search Results for "transmission towers"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "transmission towers"

49 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 49 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows CENVAT Credit on Mobile Towers and Prefabricated Buildings for Mobile Service Providers — Interprets 'Capital Goods' and 'Inputs' Under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Mobile towers and PFBs are essential for providing telecom services and qualify as capital goods or inputs under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.

22 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court of India adjudicated a batch of appeals concerning the eligibility of mobile service providers (MSPs) to claim CENVAT credit on exci...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Transmission Tower Construction Under Subsequently Revoked Restraint Order. Work done under Section 16(2) Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 order held valid despite later revocation for lack of jurisdiction, as order was in force at time of execution.

17 Apr 2024

The petitioner, Maheshkumar G. Garodia, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challenging ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Rental Compensation for Transmission Towers Erected in 1981 Without Consent or Compensation. Landowners entitled to compensation under Section 10(d) of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 read with Section 164 of the Electricity Act, 2003 for continued use of land.

7 Dec 2022

The petitioners, eight landowners from Ashiv and Wangi villages in Latur district, filed a writ petition seeking quashing of an order dated 04.07.2018...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Power Tariff Dispute — State Directed to Compensate Appellant for Delayed Transmission Line Construction. Contractual Obligation to Provide Free Power Under Clause 10 of Agreement Cannot Be Avoided Due to KSEB's Failure to Complete Transmission Line.

30 Jul 2019

The case involves an appeal by Indsil Hydro Power & Manganese Ltd against the State of Kerala and the Kerala State Electricity Board (KSEB) regarding ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Telecom Tower Installations on Cooperative Society Rooftops. Held that telecom towers are not structures requiring consent under Section 79A of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, and MCGM circular requiring consent is ultra vires.

23 Jan 2019

The judgment concerns four writ petitions filed by residents and cooperative housing societies challenging the installation of telecom towers on the r...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Injunction in Electricity Transmission Line Dispute — Balance of Convenience Favours Completion of Line Subject to Compensation. The Court held that where the District Magistrate has granted permission under Section 16(1) of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 and 80% of the work is complete, the balance of convenience does not justify an interim injunction.

9 Jan 2019

The first respondent, IVP Limited, owned non-agricultural land in villages Vadavali and Mohane. It filed a suit for permanent injunction alleging that...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Injunction in Electricity Act Dispute — LILO Scheme Not a 'Works' Under Section 164. Court holds that LILO scheme does not constitute 'laying of electric lines' under Section 164 of the Electricity Act, 2003, and that the District Judge correctly upheld the injunction against the petitioner.

9 Jan 2019

The petitioner, Century Rayon Limited, challenged an order dated 28 June 2018 passed by the learned District Judge-4, Kalyan, dismissing its Miscellan...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Deputy Commissioner's Order in Electricity Line Dispute — Violation of Natural Justice and Lack of Jurisdiction. Order under Section 16 of Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 set aside as no hearing was given to landowners before granting permission for drawing electricity lines.

23 Nov 2018

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Mr. Manohar Shetty and Mr. Sunil Kumar Shetty against the Deputy Commissioner and District Magistrat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Vodafone's Appeal on CENVAT Credit for Telecom Towers and Shelters. CENVAT Credit on Towers and Prefabricated Buildings Denied as They Are Immovable Property and Not Capital Goods Under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.

10 Sep 2015

The Appellant, Vodafone India Ltd., filed appeals under section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994, cha...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Transmission Line Over Private Land, Upholds Validity of Section 164 of Electricity Act, 2003. The Court Held That the Provisions for Laying Electricity Lines Without Prior Consent Are Constitutional as They Provide for Hearing and Compensation.

3 Aug 2015

The petitioners, Jarnail Singh and Surinder Singh, are owners of land in Nagpur over which respondent No.1, Maharashtra State Electricity Transmission...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)