Search Results for "transmission tower"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "transmission tower"

57 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 57 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Against BWSSB for Unauthorised Laying of Sewer Pipelines in Private Lands Without Acquisition. Petitioners Challenge Section 77 as Unconstitutional and Seek Compensation for Violation of Right to Property Under Article 300A.

1 Jun 2026

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows CENVAT Credit on Mobile Towers and Prefabricated Buildings for Mobile Service Providers — Interprets 'Capital Goods' and 'Inputs' Under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Mobile towers and PFBs are essential for providing telecom services and qualify as capital goods or inputs under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.

22 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court of India adjudicated a batch of appeals concerning the eligibility of mobile service providers (MSPs) to claim CENVAT credit on exci...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Transmission Tower Construction Under Subsequently Revoked Restraint Order. Work done under Section 16(2) Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 order held valid despite later revocation for lack of jurisdiction, as order was in force at time of execution.

17 Apr 2024

The petitioner, Maheshkumar G. Garodia, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challenging ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Rental Compensation for Transmission Towers Erected in 1981 Without Consent or Compensation. Landowners entitled to compensation under Section 10(d) of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 read with Section 164 of the Electricity Act, 2003 for continued use of land.

7 Dec 2022

The petitioners, eight landowners from Ashiv and Wangi villages in Latur district, filed a writ petition seeking quashing of an order dated 04.07.2018...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging KERC Order Dated 14.05.2018. The Petitioners, Renewable Energy Companies, Seek to Quash the Regulatory Order.

13 Mar 2019

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a batch of writ petitions filed by various renewable energy companies, including Renew Power Limited an...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Injunction in Electricity Transmission Line Dispute — Balance of Convenience Favours Completion of Line Subject to Compensation. The Court held that where the District Magistrate has granted permission under Section 16(1) of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 and 80% of the work is complete, the balance of convenience does not justify an interim injunction.

9 Jan 2019

The first respondent, IVP Limited, owned non-agricultural land in villages Vadavali and Mohane. It filed a suit for permanent injunction alleging that...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Injunction in Electricity Act Dispute — LILO Scheme Not a 'Works' Under Section 164. Court holds that LILO scheme does not constitute 'laying of electric lines' under Section 164 of the Electricity Act, 2003, and that the District Judge correctly upheld the injunction against the petitioner.

9 Jan 2019

The petitioner, Century Rayon Limited, challenged an order dated 28 June 2018 passed by the learned District Judge-4, Kalyan, dismissing its Miscellan...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Deputy Commissioner's Order in Electricity Line Dispute — Violation of Natural Justice and Lack of Jurisdiction. Order under Section 16 of Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 set aside as no hearing was given to landowners before granting permission for drawing electricity lines.

23 Nov 2018

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Mr. Manohar Shetty and Mr. Sunil Kumar Shetty against the Deputy Commissioner and District Magistrat...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Upholds Compensation Determination Under Indian Telegraph Act for Land Diminution Due to Transmission Tower Erection. District Court's Award of Compensation for Diminution in Land Value Upheld in Revision Petitions Under Section 115 of CPC.

30 Sep 2015

The matter arose from a batch of miscellaneous petitions filed by landowners under Section 16(3) of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885, seeking compensati...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Transmission Line Over Private Land, Upholds Validity of Section 164 of Electricity Act, 2003. The Court Held That the Provisions for Laying Electricity Lines Without Prior Consent Are Constitutional as They Provide for Hearing and Compensation.

3 Aug 2015

The petitioners, Jarnail Singh and Surinder Singh, are owners of land in Nagpur over which respondent No.1, Maharashtra State Electricity Transmission...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)