Search Results for "tiger"

51 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 51 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Wildlife Protection Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Procedural Lapses. Conviction under Sections 39 and 40 of Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 set aside as prosecution failed to prove possession of animal articles beyond reasonable doubt.

The petitioner, Boraiah @ Boregowda @ Papanna, was originally acquitted by the trial court (Civil Judge (Jr. Dn.) & JMFC, Gundlupet) in C.C.No.494/200...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Cancels Bail of Accused in Tiger Poaching Case Under Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 — Accused Found to Be Financier and Key Link in Transnational Wildlife Trafficking.

The State of Maharashtra (Forest Department) filed an application under Section 439(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 seeking cancellation of ba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Wildlife Product Seizure Case but Reduces Sentence from 6 to 3 Years. Conscious possession of tiger parts established; discrepancies in trap proceedings not sufficient to create doubt; sentence reduced considering young age and time served.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals challenging the conviction of Rajesh and Makbool Ahmed under the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 for illegal ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Compensation for Crop Damage by Tigers in Agricultural Land - State Directed to Pay for Banana Plantation Loss. Forest Department's Recommendation for Compensation at Rs.48 per Plant Upheld; Finance Department's Refusal Based on No Policy Held Arbitrary.

The petitioner, Baburao Abaji Aglawe, a retired government servant, owned agricultural land in Seloo, Wardha, where he cultivated banana plants on 5 a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Wildlife Crime Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Procedural Lapses. Conviction under Sections 9 and 39(a) of Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 and Section 379 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove possession or sale of tiger skin beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to a criminal revision petition filed by two petitioners (accused Nos. 3 and 4) challenging their conviction under Sections 9 and 39...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Compensation for Tiger Attack Victim Under Government Resolution on Man-Animal Conflict. Mental trauma from a sudden tiger attack constitutes 'serious injury' under the Government Resolution dated 28.11.2016, entitling the victim to Rs.1,00,000/- compensation.

The petitioner, Kavita Khobragade, a labourer from Waneri, Maharashtra, was attacked by a tiger and sustained multiple lacerated simple wounds on her ...