Search Results for "terrorist conspiracy"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "terrorist conspiracy"

70 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 70 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Senior Police Inspector in Mansukh Hiran Murder Case - No Prima Facie Evidence of Conspiracy Under UAP Act. Court held that mere meetings and use of benami SIM card without corroboration do not establish criminal conspiracy under Sections 16, 18, 20 of UAP Act, 1967.

18 Nov 2024

The appellant, Sunil Dharma Mane, a Senior Inspector of Police, was arrested on 23 April 2021 in connection with the murder of Mansukh Hiran and relat...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Grants Bail to Appellant in UAPA Case, Citing Lack of Prima Facie Evidence. Court Highlights Prosecution’s Flawed Charge Sheet and Upholds "Bail as Rule, Jail as Exception" Principle

13 Aug 2024

The prosecution failed to establish prima facie evidence linking the appellant to offences under UAPA or IPC. Distortion of Witness Statement: Pr...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Bail Appeal in NIA Case — Accused No.16 in Terror Conspiracy Case Denied Bail Due to Prima Facie Involvement and Flight Risk. The court held that the accused's active participation in the conspiracy and the serious nature of offences under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 and Indian Penal Code, 1860 warranted denial of bail.

15 Jun 2023

The appellant, Zabiulla @ Zabibulla, accused No.16 in Spl.C.C.No.320/2020, filed a criminal appeal under Section 21(4) of the National Investigation A...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused in NIA Murder Case on Grounds of Parity and Delay in Trial. Appellants Accused of Murder Under Section 302 IPC and Offences Under Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act Granted Bail as Co-Accused Already Released.

1 Jul 2022

The appellants, accused Nos. 1 and 4, filed a criminal appeal under Section 21(4) of the NIA Act challenging the order dated 21.04.2021 passed by the ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Bail for Accused in UAPA Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence and Prolonged Incarceration. Court Holds That Statutory Restrictions Under Section 43D(5) of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 Do Not Oust Constitutional Courts' Power to Grant Bail Based on Fundamental Rights Violations and Trial Delays.

28 Oct 2021

The Supreme Court dealt with two criminal appeals arising from a Kerala High Court judgment concerning bail granted to accused persons under the Unlaw...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Denial of Bail to Accused in Terror Funding Case Under Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 — High Court Order Set Aside for Erroneous Application of Section 43D(5) Bar. The Court held that the bar under Section 43D(5) applies when the court finds a prima facie case, and the High Court's approach was contrary to law.

1 Mar 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the National Investigation Agency (NIA) against the Delhi High Court's order granting bail to Zahoor Ahm...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction Under UAPA for Conspiracy to Commit Terrorist Acts — Acquittal for Attempt to Commit Offences Under IPC and UAPA. Appellants convicted under Section 18 of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 for conspiracy to commit terrorist acts, but acquitted of attempt and other charges due to lack of evidence.

3 Dec 2018

The case involves an appeal by Abdul Latif Abdul Rashid Shaikh @ Guddu and Riaz Ali Abubakar Shaikh @ Riyan against their conviction under Section 18 ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Seeking Discharge in NIA Murder Case — Petitioner Failed to Show Prima Facie Case for Discharge Under Section 227 Cr.P.C. The court held that at the stage of framing charges, only a prima facie case is required, and the petitioner's involvement in the murder of Rudresh using a machete was prima facie established under Sections 302, 201 read with 34 IPC, Sections 3 and 27 of Arms Act, and Sections 15, 16, 17, 18 and 20 of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967.

22 Nov 2018

The petitioner, Asim Shariff, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Crimi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Alleged Maoist Members in UAP Act Case — Insufficient Evidence of Terrorist Activity. Mere Membership of Banned Organization Without Active Participation Does Not Attract Stringent Bail Restrictions Under Section 43D(5) of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967.

3 Oct 2012

The judgment concerns two bail applications filed by Jyoti Babasaheb Chorge (Accused No.4) and Sushma Hemant Ramtekke (Accused No.2) in Sessions Case ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bail Appeal in POTA Case — Confessional Statement of Co-Accused and Recovery of AK-56 Rifle Considered Sufficient for Prima Facie Case. The court held that the confessional statement of a co-accused and recovery of an AK-56 rifle are relevant considerations for denying bail under Section 49 of the Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002.

19 Dec 2005

The appellant, Aatif Nasir Mulla, was an accused in POTA Special Case No. 2 of 2003 pending before the Special Court, Mumbai, for his alleged involvem...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)