Search Results for "temporary misappropriation"

34 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 34 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Court Clerk for Criminal Breach of Trust and Forgery of Records. Property Clerk misappropriated muddemal property and amounts, and made false entries in registers, convicted under Sections 409, 466, 477 IPC.

The applicant, Kanhaiyalal Damahe, was a property clerk in the Court of Civil Judge Junior Division, Saoner, from 1.6.2001 to 31.5.2005. During his te...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Orders Rs. 25 Lakh Compensation in Matrimonial Misappropriation Case. Upholding a woman’s right to her stridhan, the Supreme Court reverses a Kerala High Court ruling, ordering compensation for misappropriation of gold.

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of misappropriation of stridhan (gold jewellery) in a matrimonial dispute. The appellant, Maya Gopinathan, alleg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Reinstatement Without Backwages for Bank Employee in Temporary Misappropriation Case. No Interference as Employer Did Not Challenge Reinstatement Order.

The petitioner, Ravindra N. Chaudhari, was a bank employee who was terminated from service in the year 2000 by IDBI Bank Ltd. The matter was referred ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Service Termination Case — Stigmatic Termination Without Enquiry Invalid. Termination Order Based on Allegations of Misappropriation Requires Regular Enquiry Under Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994.

The appellant, Ku. Jaya Maturkar, was appointed as a full-time Lecturer in Home Economics on a temporary basis by the Wainganga Babuudesshiya Vikas Sa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Interim Relief Against Dismissal in Misappropriation Case. Labour Court and Industrial Court Correctly Refused to Restrain Employer from Issuing Punishment Order at Second Show Cause Stage Under MRTU and PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Dhanraj Gaikwad, was employed as a clerk with the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) since 2008. He was charge-sheet...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Reinstates Dismissal of Bank Employee in Industrial Disputes Case Due to Fraudulent Misappropriation. Tribunal's Interference Under Section 11A of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Held Unjustified as Punishment Was Not Shockingly Disproportionate Given Serious Nature of Fraud.

The dispute arose from the dismissal of a bank employee for fraudulent misappropriation of funds. The respondent employee, a Clerk-cum-Typist, was sus...