Search Results for "telecom tower"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "telecom tower"

23 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 23 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Telecom Infrastructure Charges Case Over Retrospective Application. Appellant's Circular Increasing Charges from 2009 Held Invalid as Yearly Payments Are Made Upfront, Making Retrospective Burden Unreasonable Under Interconnection Agreements.

22 Sep 2022

The dispute arose from appeals filed by Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. challenging a judgment by the Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal. Th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Telecom Tower Installations on Cooperative Society Rooftops. Held that telecom towers are not structures requiring consent under Section 79A of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, and MCGM circular requiring consent is ultra vires.

23 Jan 2019

The judgment concerns four writ petitions filed by residents and cooperative housing societies challenging the installation of telecom towers on the r...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Vodafone's Appeal on CENVAT Credit for Telecom Towers and Shelters. CENVAT Credit on Towers and Prefabricated Buildings Denied as They Are Immovable Property and Not Capital Goods Under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.

10 Sep 2015

The Appellant, Vodafone India Ltd., filed appeals under section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994, cha...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging SEBI's Power to Call Call Data Records. SEBI's Investigative Powers Under Section 11 of SEBI Act, 1992 Include Access to CDRs, and Such Access Does Not Violate Right to Privacy.

22 Apr 2014

The Bombay High Court dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by the Indian Council of Investors challenging the Securities and Exchange Bo...

High Court

High Court Quashes Panchayat Notice Against Telecom Tower Operator for Lack of Authority Under Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. Panchayat Cannot Interfere with Licensed Telecom Infrastructure Sharing as It Falls Under Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 and DoT Guidelines.

3 Jul 2019

The petitioner, Tower Vision India Private Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act and licensed by the Ministry of Communications, Depar...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Finds Reliance Companies Guilty of Contempt for Breach of Undertakings to Pay INR 550 Crore to Ericsson India Pvt. Ltd. The court held that the undertakings making payment conditional upon sale of assets were contrary to the court's order and constituted wilful disobedience.

20 Feb 2019

The Supreme Court of India dealt with three contempt petitions filed by Ericsson India Pvt. Ltd. against Reliance Communications Ltd., Reliance Teleco...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Termination but Sets Aside Blacklisting in Contract Dispute Due to Violation of Natural Justice. The termination was justified under Clause 59 of the General Conditions of Contract based on negligence evidence, but blacklisting under Rule 10 of the Contractor Registration Rules, 2012, was invalidated for lack of show-cause notice and application of mind.

2 Apr 2026

The dispute involved a contractor engaged by the Water and Sanitation Department of Jharkhand for constructing an Elevated Service Reservoir, where th...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Termination but Sets Aside Blacklisting in Contract Dispute Due to Violation of Natural Justice. The termination was justified based on negligence and non-compliance with design, but blacklisting was invalidated for lack of specific show-cause notice and failure to adhere to audi alteram partem under Rule 10 of Contractor Registration Rules, 2012.

2 Apr 2026

The dispute involved a contractor engaged by the Water and Sanitation Department of Jharkhand for constructing an Elevated Service Reservoir. The cont...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Telecom Tower Installation in Residential Area Under Section 419 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 — Municipal Corporation Cannot Refuse Permission Based on Unauthorized Policy Restricting Towers in Residential Zones. Held that the power to grant permission under Section 419 is quasi-judicial and must be exercised reasonably, and a blanket ban on telecom towers in residential areas is ultra vires the Act.

26 Sep 2017

The petitioner, Bharti Airtel Limited, a telecom service provider, sought permission from the Mira Bhayandar Municipal Corporation to install a teleco...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Cellular Company's Petition Against Panchayat Orders for Demolition of Telecom Tower. Held that a mobile phone tower is not a 'building' under Section 135 of the Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994, and the Panchayat lacked jurisdiction to require prior permission or order removal.

5 May 2005

The petitioner, Bharti Cellular Ltd., a cellular service provider, installed a mobile phone tower on the terrace of a building in Navelim, Goa. The Vi...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)