Search Results for "technical know-how"

15 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 15 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Tender Cancellation in PMGSY Contract — Violation of Natural Justice and Arbitrary Action. Tender Cancellation Without Show Cause Notice and Without Considering Lowest Bidder's Rights Held Illegal Under Article 14 and 226 of Constitution.

The petitioner, M/s. Mundhe Contractors, a partnership firm, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the canc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Interest on Refund of TDS Under Section 244A of Income Tax Act — Mandamus Issued for Payment of Interest on Delayed Refund. CBDT Communication Denying Interest Held Contrary to Statutory Provisions and Quashed.

The petitioner, M/s. Sunflag Iron & Steel Co. Ltd., a public limited company engaged in steel manufacturing, entered into an agreement with a German c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Discriminatory Tender Conditions in Telecom Infrastructure Bid. Eligibility criteria requiring prior experience in road development and minimum turnover of Rs. 100 crores held arbitrary and violative of Article 14.

The petitioner, High-G Transmissions Pvt. Ltd., a private limited company registered as an Infrastructure Provider under the Indian Telegraph Act, 188...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Sales Tax Assessment Orders Due to Availability of Alternative Remedy. Petitioners Failed to Show Exceptional Circumstances to Bypass Statutory Remedy of Reference Under Section 61(1) of Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959.

The petitioners, Tata Sons Limited and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court chal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds Plaintiff's Prescriptive Title in Property Dispute — Continuous Possession for Over 30 Years Establishes Ownership Under Limitation Act, 1963. Adverse Possession Claim Succeeds as Defendants Fail to Prove Their Ownership or Possession of Survey No.85/1.

The dispute concerns a property admeasuring about 6225 sq. metres, surveyed under No.85/1 as 'Shristhal' in Poinguinim village, Canacona Taluka, Goa. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Plaintiff's Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Declares Prescriptive Title Over Survey No.85/1. Court holds that continuous possession for over 12 years confers ownership by adverse possession under the Limitation Act, 1963.

The dispute in this second appeal concerns a property admeasuring about 6225 square meters, surveyed under No.85/1, located in Poinguinim village, Can...