Search Results for "tariff refund"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "tariff refund"

147 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 147 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows MSEDCL's Petitions Challenging CGRF Orders on Recovery of Additional Charges from Consumers. MERC Orders on FAC and AEC Recovery Upheld as Binding on Distribution Licensee.

16 Jul 2024

The Bombay High Court dismissed a group of writ petitions filed by Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. (MSEDCL) challenging orders...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows BSNL's Petition Against MSEDCL for Wrongful Tariff Categorization Under Electricity Act, 2003. Telecom Service Provider Cannot Be Classified as 'Commercial' for Electricity Tariff Purposes; MERC Must Determine Correct Category.

16 Apr 2024

The Petitioner, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. (BSNL), a telecom service provider and a central public sector enterprise, filed a writ petition under Artic...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Penalty for Excess Load Consumption as Unauthorised Use of Electricity Under Section 126 of Electricity Act, 2003 — Assessment at Twice the Higher Tariff Applicable for the Category of Use, Not Consumer's Category. The court held that consumption in excess of connected load constitutes unauthorised use under Explanation (b)(iv) and assessment under Section 126(6) must be at twice the tariff for the category for which electricity was unauthorisedly used.

9 Dec 2022

The case involves a batch of appeals by the Kerala State Electricity Board (KSEB) against a judgment of the Kerala High Court which held that for unau...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Settlement Commission in Customs Duty Case — Petitioner's Full Disclosure and Cooperation Justifies Settlement. Settlement Commission's Rejection of Application for Non-Disclosure of Additional Amounts Set Aside as Unreasonable Under Section 127B of Customs Act, 1962.

15 Sep 2022

The petitioner, Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd., is engaged in the manufacture of vehicles in India. It filed four applications before the Settlement Commiss...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Terminal Excise Duty Refund Dispute Under Foreign Trade Policy. Export Oriented Units Not Entitled to Refund as Procurement from Domestic Tariff Area Units Was Ab Initio Exempt from Excise Duty Under Paragraphs 6.2(b) and 6.11(c)(ii) of Foreign Trade Policy, 2009-2014.

4 Jan 2022

The dispute involved appeals by Export Oriented Units (EOUs) challenging the refusal of refund claims for Terminal Excise Duty (TED) paid on excisable...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals of Generating Company and State Utility in Electricity Tariff Dispute. Deemed Generation Incentive Not Payable After 1995 Notification; Supplementary Agreement Bars Retrospective Interest on Deemed Loan.

6 May 2020

The Supreme Court dismissed two appeals arising from a common order of the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (APTEL) concerning a power purchase agre...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Whether Refund Claim Under Customs Act Requires Appeal Against Assessment Order. Self-Assessment Under Section 17 and Amendment to Section 27 by Finance Act 2011 Examined.

18 Sep 2019

The Supreme Court heard a batch of appeals filed by assessees and the Union of India against judgments of various High Courts and the Customs, Excise ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Distribution Licensee in Standby Charges Dispute with Another Licensee — Standby Charges Fixed by Government Order and Principles of Agreement Held Binding. The court upheld the Appellate Tribunal's order that TPC could not recover standby charges beyond Rs.3.5 crores per month from BSES/REL for the 275 MVA facility, as per the Government of Maharashtra's order dated 19.1.1998 and the Principles of Agreement dated 30.1.1998.

2 May 2019

The case involves a dispute between Tata Power Company Ltd. (TPC), a distribution licensee supplying electricity to the entire city of Mumbai, and Ada...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows IT Companies to be Classified as Industrial Consumers for Electricity Tariff — BESCOM's Demand for Commercial Tariff Quashed. Software development and IT-enabled services companies engaged in manufacturing activity are entitled to HT 2(A) industrial tariff under the Electricity Act, 2003.

27 Nov 2017

The case involves multiple writ petitions filed by IT companies, including Talisma Corporation Private Limited, Cognizant Technology Solutions India P...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Challenge to KERC Order on Cross-Subsidy Surcharge for Open Access Industrial Consumers. Cross-Subsidy Surcharge Upheld as Valid Regulatory Measure Under Sections 42, 61, 62, 86 of Electricity Act, 2003.

18 Sep 2017

The petitioner, Star Metallics and Power Private Limited, an industrial consumer of electricity, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of th...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)