ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NO.15468 OF 2026
17 Jul 2026The petitioner, Polestar Realtors Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking interim reli...
Search Results for "supplemental agreement"
212 result(s) found
Found 212 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Bombay Dismisses Interim Applications in Property Assignment and Supplemental Agreement Dispute. The court held that an unregistered supplemental agreement cannot modify a registered deed of assignment and was frustrated due to non-fulfillment of conditions, while the plaintiff's rights under the assignment were upheld.
4 Mar 2026The dispute arose between Applicant (Plaintiff) and (Defendant No.1) over a property assignment. On 20.11.2012, Defendant No.1 executed a registered D...
- 343
High Court
Madras High Court Allows Official Assignee to Sell Insolvent's Property in Insolvency Proceedings — Property Not Subject to Prior Agreement of Sale as No Valid Contract Existed. The court held that the Official Assignee has the power to sell the insolvent's property free from an alleged agreement of sale that was not valid or enforceable under the Presidency Town Insolvency Act, 1909.
27 Feb 2026The case involves an appeal filed by the Official Assignee of the High Court of Madras, representing the estate of Arjunlal Sunderdas (the insolvent),...
- 102
High Court
Madras High Court Allows Official Assignee to Sell Insolvent's Property in Insolvency Proceedings — Property Not Subject to Attachment Under Section 60 CPC as It Was Not in Possession of Insolvent at Time of Adjudication. The Court held that upon adjudication, all property of the insolvent vests in the Official Assignee under Section 28(2) of the Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1909, and attachment before judgment does not prevent such vesting.
27 Feb 2026The case arises from insolvency proceedings against Arjunlal Sunderdas (the insolvent). The Official Assignee, representing the estate of the insolven...
- 50
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Sets Aside Rejection of Section 8 Application. Development Agreement Contains Valid Arbitration Clause, Disputes Must Be Referred to Arbitration.
4 Nov 2025The Appellant, Om Swayambhu Siddhivinayak, filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an order dated ...
- 91
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Setting Aside of Arbitral Award for Specific Performance of Unregistered Draft Supplemental Agreement. Court Holds That a Draft Agreement with Blank Material Terms Cannot Be Enforced as a Contract, and the Arbitrator's Findings Were Patently Illegal and Manifestly Arbitrary.
25 Jun 2024The case involves two Commercial Appeals (90 of 2020 and 91 of 2020) arising from an Arbitral Award dated 14th February 2017, which was set aside by a...
- 409
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Reference Case — Licence Agreement Contained Valid Arbitration Clause for Disputes Arising from Termination and Recovery of Possession. The Court held that the arbitration clause survived termination and that the Commercial Court erred in refusing reference under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
23 Apr 2023The Supreme Court considered appeals against a common judgment of the Gujarat High Court dismissing First Appeals filed by the appellant against order...
- 123
High Court
Bombay High Court Delivers Common Judgment on Cross Appeals Against Order Partly Setting Aside Arbitral Award in BOT Contract Dispute. The Court examines whether the Single Judge correctly assessed claims arising from a Build-Operate-Transfer road project, considering the State's argument on suppressed Office Note and extension of toll collection period.
4 May 2018These appeals arise out of a common order of a single Judge of the High Court dated 12 February 2015 in three arbitration petitions challenging an arb...
High Court
Bombay High Court Partially Allows Contractor's Petition and Dismisses State's Petitions in BOT Contract Dispute — Extension of Concession Period and Damages for Suspension of Toll Collection Upheld. The court upheld the arbitral tribunal's interpretation of the BOT contract regarding extension of concession period and damages, finding no error apparent on the face of the award under Section 30 of the Arbitration Act, 1940.
12 Feb 2015The judgment concerns three arbitration petitions arising from two arbitral awards under the Arbitration Act, 1940, relating to a Build, Operate and T...
- 108
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Appointment of Court Receiver and Directions for Possession in Redevelopment Dispute — Non-Consenting Members Directed to Vacate to Facilitate Redevelopment. Court held that overwhelming majority of society members having consented, non-consenting members cannot obstruct redevelopment and must hand over possession through Court Receiver.
3 Oct 2013The appeals arose from a judgment of the Learned Single Judge dated 16 September 2013 in a motion taken out by the first respondent (developer) in a s...
- 198
