Search Results for "summoning additional accused"

225 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 225 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court upheld the summoning of additional accused post-trial conclusion, emphasizing the High Court’s revisional powers and the necessity of fresh trials to ensure justice.

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — Section 319 — Summoning of Additional Accused Post-Trial Conclusion Held Valid — Reiteration of Revi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Summoning Under Section 319 CrPC After Judgment of Conviction. Trial Court Cannot Summon Additional Accused After Pronouncing Judgment as It Becomes Functus Officio.

The Supreme Court considered the appeal against the summoning of Sukhpal Singh Khaira as an additional accused under Section 319 CrPC after the trial ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in NDPS Case: Summoning Under Section 319 CrPC After Conviction Is Impermissible. The power under Section 319 CrPC can be exercised only before the pronouncement of judgment; once the trial concludes and judgment is pronounced, the court becomes functus officio.

The Supreme Court of India heard two criminal appeals arising from a common judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, which had dismissed crimina...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Section 319 CrPC Case — Trial Court Directed to Reconsider Summoning of Additional Accused. Prima Facie Evidence Test Must Be Applied for Summoning Under Section 319 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

The petitioner, Renuka @ Shivubai, filed a criminal revision petition under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes Summons in Medical Negligence Case for Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC — Doctor and Hospital Manager Protected as Public Servants Under Section 2(c) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The case involves two criminal writ petitions filed by Dr. Vivekanand Jawali (a cardiac surgeon) and Mr. Karthik Rajagopal (Zonal Director of Fortis H...