Search Results for "summary suit for possession"

346 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 346 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Suit Based on Adverse Possession — Overrules Earlier View That Adverse Possession Can Only Be Used as Shield. Plaintiff Who Has Perfected Title by Adverse Possession Can Sue for Declaration and Protection or Recovery of Possession.

The Supreme Court addressed the question whether a person claiming title by adverse possession can maintain a suit for declaration of title and for pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Section 6 Specific Relief Act – Proof of Possession Mandatory.

This case arose from a dispute over possession of a dispensary premises in Mumbai between family members. The plaintiffs claimed that they were in set...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Temporary Injunction for Restoration of Possession in Suit for Specific Performance and Possession — Plaintiff Establishes Prima Facie Case and Balance of Convenience in His Favor.

The plaintiff filed an interim application seeking temporary injunction for restoration of possession of the suit premises during the pendency of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Summary Judgment in Recovery Suit Against DDA for Refund of Sale Consideration After Land Acquisition Lapses. The Court held that DDA cannot retain the money after failing to convey title due to lapsing of acquisition, and the suit was within limitation.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal against the Delhi High Court's order dismissing the appellant's application for summary judgment under Order XIII...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Revision Application in Possession Dispute - Applicant Challenge to Decree Under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act Fails - Trial Court's Order Restoring Possession Upheld

The High Court dismissed the Civil Revision Application filed by the Applicant-Defendant challenging the Trial Court's decree in Special Civil Suit No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Non-Compliance with Section 69 of Indian Partnership Act and Bar of Res Judicata. Suit by unregistered partnership firm held not maintainable; subsequent suit for same cause of action without withdrawing earlier suit also barred.

The plaintiff, Jayesh Pandya, a real estate broker, conducted business under the name 'Pandya & Shah Associates', which was an unregistered partnershi...