Search Results for "suit for possession"

31 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 31 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application in Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits. Court holds that plaint cannot be rejected under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC when the suit is not barred by limitation and the claim for mesne profits is not time-barred.

The petitioner, M/s. Ramnarain Sons Pvt Ltd, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging two orders: (1) an order...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Possession Suit Limitation Dispute — Article 64 Limitation Act, 1963 Applicable. High Court erred in holding suit within limitation based on earlier observation; limitation runs from date of dispossession, not from declaration of title.

The present appeal arises from a long-standing property dispute. The appellants are the children of late Srinivas Shetty, who had executed a sale deed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Dargah Land Dispute, Upholds Mutawalis' Right to Possession. Suit for Possession Based on Title Governed by 12-Year Limitation Under Article 65 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The case involves a dispute over agricultural lands situated at village Haregaon, Tq. Ausa, Dist. Latur, claimed by the plaintiffs (respondents herein...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MIDC Revision Against Restoration of Possession Under Section 6 Specific Relief Act. Suit for Possession Based on Prior Possession Maintainable Even Against Statutory Corporation Acting Under Court Orders.

The Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC) filed a Civil Revision Application challenging the order of the City Civil Court Judge, Mumb...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision in Suit for Possession Under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act — Plaintiff's Prior Possession Established Despite Temporary Absence. Possession Through Tenant is Sufficient for Summary Suit Under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The dispute arises out of a suit under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, concerning Plot No. 8 in the layout of Uruvila Cooperative Housing ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals in Property Dispute Over Common Plot — Confirms Concurrent Findings of Fact and Dismisses Appeals with Costs.

The case involves a property dispute between the appellant, Ramchandra Govindrao Kottawar, and the respondents, Mrs. Dorpadabai Appasaheb Dodmani and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Land Encroachment Suit Due to Lack of Proper Measurement. Court holds that re-measurement of suit field and adjoining lands is necessary to determine encroachment when description of property in plaint is insufficient under Order VII Rule 3 CPC.

The case involves a second appeal filed by Laxman Wamanrao Nagapure against the judgment and order dated 6.8.2012 passed by the learned District Judge...