Search Results for "suit for possession"

48 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 48 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Forfeiture of Tenancy under Section 111(g) TPA Not Attracted When Tenant Claims Firm Tenancy Without Denying Landlord’s Title – Bombay High Court Restores Trial Court Decree in Second Appeal No. 81 of 2013 (2026)

The plaintiff filed a suit for possession, arrears of rent, and damages claiming that Late Mohd. Siddique was his tenant since 1960. Lat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Hereditary Pujari Rights in Century-Old Temple Dispute -- Bombay Public Trust Act Jurisdiction Clarified -- Ancestral Religious Rights Recognized

The Supreme Court addressed a century-old dispute over hereditary pujari rights at the Amogasidda temple -- The Court examined whether civil courts ha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Modifies Decree in Land Possession Case Based on Court Receiver's Report. Appellant's Firm Seeks Modification of Adverse Possession Declaration to Align with Actual Possession Area After Three Decades of Status Quo

The High Court of Bombay partly allowed First Appeal No. 945 of 1994 by modifying the trial court's decree regarding adverse possession. The original ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

“Mandatory Injunction vs Possession: Supreme Court Clarifies Section 41(h) Specific Relief Act (2026 INSC 61)”“Cloud on Title & Possession: Why Injunction Suit Fails

In Sanjay Paliwal v. Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd., the plaintiffs sought a mandatory injunction to remove a wall allegedly blocking access to their l...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Civil Suit for Declaration of Title and Possession — Res Judicata, Limitation, and Representative Suit Discussed — Supreme Court Set Aside High Court’s Decree and Dismissed the Suit.

A suit filed in a representative capacity cannot override the conclusive effect of a decree already attained finality, and res judicata shall bar any ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute Over Rejection of Plaint Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. The Court held that the plaint disclosed triable issues regarding mortgage, power of attorney revocation, and jurisdiction, and could not be rejected at the threshold.

The appellant, Vinod Infra Developers Ltd., claimed ownership of agricultural land in Jodhpur and alleged that it had borrowed Rs. 7.5 crores from res...