Search Results for "sugarcane transport"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "sugarcane transport"

72 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 72 result(s)

Supreme Court

"Supreme Court Clarifies Legislative Competence on Alcohol Regulation: Potable vs Industrial Alcohol" "A landmark judgment addressing the scope of State and Union powers on regulating alcohol under the Indian Constitution."

23 Oct 2024

The Supreme Court of India revisited the legislative competence concerning the regulation of alcohol under the Constitution. The court examined whethe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Distillery Petitions Challenging Denial of NOC for Ethanol Production Under Maharashtra Excise Act. Court holds that denial of No Objection Certificate for ethanol production from sugarcane juice is arbitrary and violative of Article 14 when based on policy not applicable to molasses-based distilleries.

9 Aug 2023

The judgment involves multiple writ petitions filed by distilleries challenging the denial of No Objection Certificate (NOC) by the State of Maharasht...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Acceptance of Nomination in Sugar Factory Election Due to Violation of Bye-Laws. The Returning Officer's order overruling objection was set aside for failing to properly examine eligibility criteria under Rule 28(2) read with Rule 9 of the bye-laws.

23 Jun 2023

The petitioner, a contesting member in the election to Purna Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana (a sugar factory), filed a writ petition challenging the decisio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Equal FRP for Non-Member Sugarcane Growers - Sugar Factory Cannot Discriminate Between Members and Non-Members in Payment of Fair and Remunerative Price. The court held that same price must be paid to all sugarcane growers whose cane is crushed in the factory, relying on Shrinath Maruti Reddy and the Sugar Commissioner's circular.

30 Sep 2022

The petitioners, eight sugarcane growers from Bramhani, Tal. Rahuri, Dist. Ahmednagar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds State's Power to Fix Higher Sugarcane Price in Conflict Resolution Between Constitution Benches. State Advised Price (SAP) is Valid and Not Repugnant to Central Minimum Price Under Essential Commodities Act, 1955 and Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966.

22 Apr 2020

The Supreme Court considered a reference from a three-judge bench regarding an alleged conflict between two Constitution Bench decisions: Ch. Tika Ram...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeals in Income Tax Case on Disallowance of Excess Cane Price Paid by Cooperative Society. Excess Payment Over Statutory Price Under Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966 Held Not Deductible as Business Expenditure Under Section 37(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961.

5 Mar 2019

The case involves a batch of appeals by the Commissioner of Income Tax, Bombay against the assessee, Tasgaon Taluka Sahakari Sikhar Karkhana Limited, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows MSRTC Appeal in Motor Accident Claim, Reduces Compensation for Agriculturist's Death; Supervision Loss Principle Applied Instead of Full Income Loss. Court Holds That Agricultural Income Is Not Entirely Lost Upon Death of Landowner, and Loss of Supervision Charges at Rs. 6,000 per Month Is Appropriate Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

6 Jul 2018

The appeal arose from a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award in a claim petition filed by the legal heirs of Popatrao Gulabrao Kate, who died in a roa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Government Resolution Para 3 as Discriminatory — Classification Between Cooperative and Non-Cooperative Sugar Factories Held Reasonable Under Article 14. The court ruled that the distinction in para 3 of the Government Resolution dated 21.10.2011 for payment of recovery loss and transportation charges does not violate Article 14 as it is based on intelligible differentia.

21 Jun 2017

The petitioners, three non-cooperative sugar factories, challenged para 3 of the Government Resolution dated 21.10.2011, claiming it created hostile d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Aerial Distance Certificate for New Sugar Factory — Notification Increasing Distance Not Retrospective. The court held that the Commissioner of Sugar was not required to consider factors beyond aerial distance under Clause 6-B of the Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966.

5 Dec 2014

The petitioner, a sugar factory registered under the Companies Act, 1956, challenged the order dated 2 July 2011 of the Commissioner of Sugar, Maharas...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to State Notification Fixing Sugarcane Price Despite Central FRP Under Essential Commodities Act. Section 6 of the EC Act Grants Overriding Effect to Central Orders Over Inconsistent State Enactments.

6 Nov 2014

Multiple writ petitions were filed before the High Court of Karnataka challenging the state government's notification fixing sugarcane price and the c...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)