Search Results for "spot delivery contract"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "spot delivery contract"

46 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 46 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Restores Arbitral Award Holding Put and Call Options in Share Purchase Agreement as Enforceable. The court held that clauses 8.5 and 8.5.1 of the Share Purchase Agreement are not forward contracts or derivatives under SCRA and SEBI circulars, and the Single Judge erred in setting aside the award.

2 Feb 2023

The appellants, Percept Finserve Private Limited and Percept Limited, entered into a Share Purchase Agreement with Edelweiss Financial Services Limite...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal in SARFAESI Act Auction Forfeiture Case — Earnest Money Deposit Forfeiture Upheld as Compensation for Breach of Contract. The Court held that forfeiture of earnest money deposit by a secured creditor under the SARFAESI Act is not subject to proof of actual loss and is governed by the terms of the auction contract, not Sections 73 and 74 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.

10 Aug 2022

The case involves two appeals by a nationalized bank (appellant) against a common judgment of the Madras High Court, which had allowed the writ petiti...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Hotel Liability for Theft of Guest's Car from Valet Parking Under Bailment and Infra Hospitium Principles. Insurer as Subrogee Can Maintain Consumer Complaint as Co-Complainant.

14 Nov 2019

The appeal arose from a consumer complaint filed by the insurer (United India Insurance Company Ltd.) and the car owner (Respondent No. 2) against the...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Hotel Liability for Theft of Guest's Car from Valet Parking Under Bailment and Infra Hospitium Principles. Insurer as Subrogee Can File Consumer Complaint Jointly with Assured.

9 Aug 2019

The appeal arose from a judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission dismissing the hotel's appeal against an order of the State Co...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Share Purchase Dispute for Patent Illegality and Perversity. The court found that the arbitrator's interpretation of a condition subsequent in a share purchase agreement was patently illegal and perverse, warranting interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

27 Mar 2019

The case involves a challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to an arbitral award arising from a share purchase agree...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Procurement Dispute — Government Department Cannot Unilaterally Rescind Contract After L1 Bidder Declared. The court held that the existence of an arbitration clause in tender documents is sufficient for appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, leaving the issue of contract formation to the arbitrator.

10 Dec 2018

The applicant, Jaina Marketing & Associates, a partnership firm, filed an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 199...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Reference Dispute — Holds Arbitration Clause Survives Termination of Main Contract Under Section 45 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Doctrine of Separability of Arbitration Agreement from Underlying Contract Applied to Refer Parties to ICC Arbitration Despite Alleged Rescission of Share Purchase Agreement by Subsequent MOU.

16 Aug 2013

The appeal arises from a judgment of a Learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dismissing a petition filed by the Appellant, Mulheim Pipecoating...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Declares Rule 6(3)(d) of Karnataka Urban Development Authority Rules 1991 as Ultra Vires and Unconstitutional — Refund of Auction Deposit Ordered with Interest. Rule 6(3)(d) allowing forfeiture of deposit without proof of loss was held to be in conflict with Section 74 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, and thus ultra vires the Constitution.

2 Jan 2013

The petitioners, Shri K Babjan and K Sulaiman, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging Rule 6(3)(d) o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Leave to Defend in Summary Suit for Recovery of Rs. 8.67 Crores Based on Share Buyback Agreement — Triable Issues Raised Regarding Non-Performance of Conditions Precedent and Liability of Defendant. The court held that where the claim is for liquidated damages for breach of a buyback agreement, it may not be a liquidated demand under Order 37 CPC, and the defendant is entitled to unconditional leave to defend if triable issues are raised.

19 Oct 2005

The plaintiff, Niskalp Investments & Trading Company Ltd., filed a summary suit under Order 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the defen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Husband's Appeal for Divorce on Grounds of Cruelty and Desertion Under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. Allegations of Cruelty Were Vague and Desertion Not Proven, Affirming Family Court's Dismissal of Divorce Petition.

8 Feb 2005

The appellant-husband filed a petition under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, challenging the Family Court, Pune's order dated 18 July 2000...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)