Search Results for "smuggling"

195 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 195 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Orders Under COFEPOSA for Lack of Proximity and Non-Application of Mind. Detention orders set aside as the detenus were not directly involved in smuggling and the detaining authority failed to consider less drastic alternatives.

The Bombay High Court, by a judgment dated 24 January 2014, allowed two criminal writ petitions challenging preventive detention orders passed under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside Preventive Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Act, Citing Lack of Consideration of Bail Conditions. Court Emphasizes Scrutiny of Detention Orders and Upholds Liberty in Preventive Detention Cases

Preventive Detention and Bail Conditions: The detaining authority must consider the efficacy of bail conditions imposed by the court before ordering ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA for Non-Application of Mind and Non-Supply of Vital Documents. Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) Violated as Statements of Co-Accused Not Furnished.

The petitioner, brother-in-law of the detenu Abdulla Gulam Mustafa, challenged a detention order dated 27.11.2003 issued by the Principal Secretary (A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Pre-Execution Challenge to COFEPOSA Detention Order for Lack of Grounds Under Alka Subhash Gadia Criteria. Petitioner's Argument That Detention Was for Wrong Purpose Rejected as Activities Constituted Smuggling, Not Mere Abetment.

The petitioner, Suresh Kumar U. Jain @ Sanjay Srinath Rana, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA for Non-Application of Mind and Non-Supply of Documents. Detenu's Statement Under Section 108 of Customs Act Not Considered, Violating Article 22(5) of Constitution.

The petitioner, son of the detenu Vashdev Gobindram Adnani, challenged the detention order dated 3-11-2004 passed by the Principal Secretary to the Go...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Loss Deduction for Confiscated Foreign Currency in Income Tax Reference. Foreign currency confiscated by customs authorities under FERA held allowable as business loss under Income Tax Act, 1961, even though treated as undisclosed income.

The case involves an income tax reference by the Revenue against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) for the assessment year 1982-83...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Detention Order Quashed Due to Lack of Specificity in Grounds. Court emphasizes the need for clear and specific reasons for preventive detention to uphold constitutional safeguards.

The detention order of Rakesh Ramdas Jejurkar under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act (COFEPOSA). The or...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA for Non-Application of Mind and Non-Supply of Vital Documents. Detenu's Retraction of Statement and Bail Conditions Ignored, Violating Article 22(5) of the Constitution.

The petitioner, son of the detenu Bittu Choith Harchandani, challenged a detention order dated 16.4.2015 passed by the second respondent under Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA for Non-Application of Mind — Detenu's Representation Not Considered Before Confirmation. Failure to Consider Representation Before Confirmation Under Section 8(f) of COFEPOSA Renders Detention Invalid.

The petitioner, brother of the detenu, challenged the detention order dated 2.4.2004 passed under section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange...