Search Results for "sick unit"

100 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 100 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in Recovery Suit Against Sick Industrial Company — Suspension of Proceedings Under Section 22(1) of SICA Does Not Bar Suit for Unadmitted Debt. High Court's Grant of 24% Compound Interest Reduced to 12% Simple Interest.

The case involves a dispute between Fertilizer Corporation of India Ltd. (FCIL), a public sector undertaking, and M/s Coromandal Sacks Private Limited...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Process in NI Act Complaint Due to Bar Under SICA Section 22A. Proceedings under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 cannot continue against a sick company without BIFR consent.

The petitioners, a company and its directors, challenged the order dated 20.04.2018 passed by the 25th Joint Civil Judge (Junior Division) and Judicia...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Claims for Damages Against Plaintiff for Wrongful Arrest of Cargo in Admiralty Suit — Undertaking Under Rule 941 of Bombay High Court (OS) Rules Not Enforceable After Suit Withdrawal Without Adjudication on Merits.

The Plaintiff, Navbharat International Ltd., filed an admiralty suit and obtained an ex-parte order dated 12th January 2010 for arrest of cargo on boa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Discharge of Accused in Cheque Bounce Case Despite BIFR Proceedings. The court held that an order under Section 22 of SICA does not automatically bar criminal proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The petitioner, Harshad Jayprasad Bakshi, filed a criminal writ petition challenging the order of the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 12th Court, Mum...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging AAIFR Order Rejecting Revival Scheme for Sick Company Under SICA. The court held that the AAIFR's findings on non-compliance and lack of feasibility were based on evidence and not perverse, thus no interference under Article 226 was warranted.

This group of writ petitions challenges a common order dated 28/5/2010 passed by the Appellate Authority for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Restrains Recovery of Excise Duty from Sick Industrial Company Without BIFR Consent. The court held that Section 22(1) of SICA bars coercive recovery of dues without prior consent of BIFR, protecting the petitioner-company's assets.

The petitioner, Polymermann (ASIA) P. Ltd., is an industrial unit engaged in the manufacture of polymer chemicals, with its factory at MIDC, Ambad, Na...