Search Results for "shelf life"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "shelf life"

45 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 45 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Complaint in Drugs and Cosmetics Act Case Due to Violation of Statutory Right Under Section 25(4) — Delay in Filing Complaint After Expiry of Shelf Life Deprives Accused of Right to Get Sample Tested from Central Drugs Laboratory.

15 Dec 2025

The petitioners, a pharmaceutical company and its directors/employees, were accused in a criminal complaint filed by the Drug Inspector under the Drug...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Seeds Act Case Due to Loss of Right to Re-test Sample. Applicant's Right Under Section 16(2) of Seeds Act, 1966 to Send Sample to Central Seed Testing Laboratory Lost as Shelf Life of Seed Expired Before Complaint Filed.

19 Sep 2016

The applicant, Regional Manager of Prabhat Agri Bio-Tech Ltd., challenged criminal proceedings in S.C.C. No. 313 of 2003 pending before the Chief Judi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Blacklisting of Drug Manufacturer for Supplying Sub-Standard Cream Due to Reliance on Erroneous Test Report. Appellate Lab Report Under Section 25(4) of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 Held Conclusive, Ignoring It Renders Decision Perverse.

1 Jan 2020

The appellant, Medipol Pharmaceutical India Pvt. Ltd., supplied Clotrimazole Cream 1% 15 gm tubes to the respondent, Post Graduate Institute of Medica...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Seed Company for Delay in Prosecution After Expiry of Seed Shelf Life — Right to Get Sample Tested from Central Seed Laboratory Under Section 16(3) of Seeds Act, 1966 Violated. The court held that the valuable right of the accused under Section 16(3) of the Seeds Act, 1966 to have the sample tested by the Central Seed Laboratory was infringed because the prosecution was filed after the expiry of the shelf life of the seeds, and such infringement vitiates the prosecution.

16 Jan 2015

The applicants, including the Managing Director of Mahyco Seeds Limited (now Maharashtra Hybrid Seed Company Limited), the company itself, and a propr...

High Court

High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Seeds Act Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Sampling Procedure. Failure to Follow Section 14(2) of Seeds Act, 1966 Renders Prosecution Invalid.

3 Nov 2017

The applicants, Ajeet Seeds Ltd., M/s Bhushan Agro Agencies, and M/s Bharatkumar Purushottam Potdar, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Managing Director in Seeds Act Case — Lack of Vicarious Liability. Complaint under Section 6(a) read with Section 19(a) of Seeds Act, 1966 fails to disclose role of petitioner as Managing Director.

8 Feb 2022

The petitioner, Rafel Del Riyo, Managing Director of Syngenta India Limited, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 197...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Directors' Application to Quash Criminal Complaint in Food Adulteration Case — Lack of Specific Allegations Against Directors. Vicarious Liability Under Section 17 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 Requires Specific Averments of Being in Charge of Business.

11 Dec 2017

The applicants, six directors of M/s Ruchi Soya Industries Ltd., filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeki...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Condonation of Delay in Food Adulteration Complaints — Delay Caused by Referral to Second Analyst Held Reasonable. The court upheld the Magistrate's order condoning delay under Section 468 CrPC, finding that the time taken for second analysis under Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 constituted a reasonable cause.

14 Jun 2013

The petitioner, Sakhahari Vyankatrao Borlepawar, a vendor and partner of M/s Pravin Agencies, filed four criminal writ petitions challenging a common ...

High Court

High Court Quashes Criminal Prosecution in Drugs & Cosmetics Act Case Due to Procedural Violations and Non-Compliance with Statutory Mandates. Prosecution was invalidated because of inordinate delay in sample testing, failure to dispatch sample portion to manufacturer depriving retesting right, and improper cognizance by Special Judge without committal under Section 193 CrPC, under Section 27(d) of Drugs & Cosmetics Act, 1940.

24 Mar 2026

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, in its criminal appellate jurisdiction, adjudicated a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of I...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Company Officials in Insecticide Act Case Due to Non-Joinder of Manufacturing Company and Expiry of Sample Shelf Life. The court held that without the company being arraigned as an accused, vicarious liability cannot be imposed on its officers, and the expiry of the sample's shelf life deprived the accused of their statutory right to get the sample tested from a third laboratory under Section 24(3) of the Insecticides Act, 1968.

22 Jan 2018

The petitioners, accused Nos. 2 and 3 in R.C.C. No. 479/2015 pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Parbhani, filed a criminal writ petition un...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)