Search Results for "setting aside decree"

1590 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1590 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Rescind Consent Decree and Allows Substitution of Legal Heirs in Recovery Suit. Consent Terms Are Binding Contract; Legal Representatives Can Be Substituted Under Order 22 CPC for Execution of Decree.

The plaintiffs filed a suit (Suit No.2011 of 2002) against the defendants for recovery of Rs.3,30,00,000 with interest. On 3rd October 2006, the parti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Restitution in Court Auction Sales: Upholding Justice Amidst Procedural Challenges Interpretation and Application of Section 144 CPC

Restitution of Judgment Debtors in Court Auction Sales: Interpretation and Application of Section 144 CPC The legal issue in this appeal revolves aro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Judgment Debtor's Objection to Execution of Decree Based on Jurisdictional Challenge Under Section 39(4) CPC. Court Holds That Section 39(4) CPC Does Not Bar Execution by the Court That Passed the Decree When the Property Is Situated Outside Its Local Limits.

The present chamber summons arose out of a suit filed by ICICI Ltd, as Debenture Trustees, against Kothri Industrial Corporation Ltd and others for re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Partition Suit, Upholding High Court's Decree on Property Shares and Invalidating Compromise. Legal Heirs' Dispute Over Ancestral and Self-Acquired Properties Resolved with Shares Determined Under Hindu Law, and Compromise Set Aside Under Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The litigation originated from a partition suit filed by Charulata Sahoo (plaintiff) against her brother Prafulla Sahoo (defendant No. 1) and sister S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Partition Suit Involving Compromise Decree Validity. Dispute pertained to joint family properties and a compromise decree under Order XXIII Rule 3 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, with allegations of sham nature.

The Supreme Court of India heard two civil appeals arising from a Division Bench judgment of the Madras High Court dated 23.11.2011, which had dismiss...