Search Results for "service of summons"

50 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 50 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Ex-Parte Decree in Recovery Suit — Sets Aside Order Rejecting Application Under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC. Failure to Serve Summons Properly and Lack of Knowledge of Proceedings Constitute Sufficient Cause for Setting Aside Ex-Parte Decree.

The appellant, Shri K. Raja, filed a Miscellaneous First Appeal under Order 43 Rule 1(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) against an order d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Ex-Parte Decree in Suit for Recovery of Money — Sets Aside Order Rejecting Application Under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC. Failure to Serve Summons Properly and Lack of Knowledge of Proceedings Constitute Sufficient Cause for Setting Aside Ex-Parte Decree.

The appellant, Shri K. Raja, filed a Miscellaneous First Appeal under Order 43 Rule 1(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) against an order d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Ex Parte Decree in Partition Suit Due to Procedural Irregularities in Service of Summons. Failure to Affix Summons on Court Building and Lack of Proper Service Affidavit Renders Ex Parte Decree Unsustainable Under Order V Rule 17 and Order IX Rule 6 CPC.

The case involves two writ petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an ex parte decree passed in a partition suit (O...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Partition Suit Due to Non-Service of Summons on Defendants, Remands Matter for Fresh Trial. Ex-parte decree set aside as trial court failed to ensure proper service, violating principles of natural justice under Section 96 CPC.

The appellants, who were defendants 1 to 6 in the original suit, filed this appeal under Section 96 read with Order 41 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Pro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order Restoring Suit and Upholds Auction Sale in Civil Appeal. High Court Erred in Granting Relief to Defendant Despite Evidence of Service and Completion of Auction Proceedings Under Order IX Rule 13 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The dispute originated from a suit for recovery of money filed by respondent no. 2 against respondent no. 1 regarding part sale consideration for prop...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Ex-Parte Decree in Property Dispute — Service of Summons Valid Through Vakalatnama Filed by Constituted Attorney

The case pertains to a suit filed by respondent No.1 (Bhavesha Suresh Goradia) against the appellant (Aviation Travels Pvt. Ltd.) and others seeking p...